The third Generation of Human Rights and the Issue of Legal Protection of the Russian-Speaking Population of Ukraine
https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2021-11-5-10-18
Abstract
Relevance. The attitude to the violation of the rights of the Russian-speaking population in Ukraine is one of the most relevant examples of the policy of double standards of the international human rights field for the modern Russian Federation, which requires a theoretical and practical response from both the Russian and international human rights communities.
The purpose is to investigate the contradictions in the modern theory and practice of international legal protection of the Russian-speaking population in Ukraine and possible ways to resolve the conflict based on the implementation of legal protection of group rights (third generation of human rights) of the Russian-speaking population.
Objectives: to show the contradictions in modern theory and problems in international practice of protecting the linguistic and cultural rights of the Russian-speaking population in the post-Soviet space; to consider the moral and legal aspects of protecting the Russian-speaking minority in Ukraine in the context of the concept of group (collective) rights; to point out the possibility of using methods based on the theory of the third generation of human rights to protect the Russian-speaking population in Ukraine and to overcome a long non-international military conflict in the region.
The research methodology includes the general principles of scientific cognition: objectivity, consistency, historicity, as well as private research methods in the field of the science of law.
The results of the study consist in proposals for more active implementation of the policy of legal protection of the Russian-speaking population within the framework of the theory of the third generation of human rights (group rights).
Conclusions. As a result of the study, it is shown that theoretical justifications of group (collective) rights or rights of the third generation can and should become the basis for a more objective and broad field of application of legal remedies, including the Russian-speaking population in Ukraine and in the post-Soviet space and abroad as a whole.
About the Author
Vadim V. MikhailovRussian Federation
Doctor of Historical Scien ces, Associate Professor, Professor of the Depart ment of History and Philosophy
15 Gastello str., St. Petersburg 196135
References
1. Aleksanyan S. R. Princip ravnopraviya i samoopredelenie narodov v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk [The principle of equal rights and selfdetermination of peoples in modern international law. Cand. legal sci. dis.]. Moscow, 2017. 228 p.
2. Alisievich E. S. Pooshchrenie i zashchita prav uyazvimyh grupp v mezhdunarodnom prave [Promotion and protection of the rights of vulnerable groups in international law]. Moscow, RUDN Publ., 2012. 431 p.
3. Van Dyke V. Collective entities and moral rights: problems in liberal-democratic thought. The Journal of Politics, 1982, no. 44, pp. 21–40.
4. Dinstein Y. Collective human rights of people and minorities. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 1976, no. 25, pp. 116–119.
5. Ethnicity and group rights; ed. by I. Shapiro, W. Kymlicka. New York, London, New York University Press, 1997. 656 p.
6. Kimlicka W. Multicultural citizenship: a liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1995. 290 p.
7. Kymlicka W. Justice and security in the accommodation of minority nationalism: comparing East and West. The Politics of Belonging: Nationalism, Liberalism and Pluralism; ed. by A. Dieckhoff. New York, Lexington, 2004, pp. 127–154.
8. Ahmetshin R. I. K probleme tret'ego pokoleniya prav cheloveka (mezhdunarodnopravovye aspekty). Diss. kand. yurid. nauk [On the problem of the third generation of human rights (international legal aspects). Cand. legal sci. dis.]. Moscow, 1999. 167 p.
9. Gorbunov S. N., Molchanov B. A. Vozmeshchenie vreda za istoricheskie nespravedlivosti [Compensation for historical injustices]. Arhangel'sk, KIRA Publ., 2013. 489 p.
10. Napso M. B. Etnicheskie kollektivnye i individual'nye prava: vybor mezhdu pravami narodov i kul'turnymi pravami individa [Ethnic collective and individual rights: the choice between the rights of peoples and the cultural rights of the individual]. Izvestiya Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gercena = Izvestiya of the A. I. Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University, 2008, no. 50, pp. 102–110.
11. Kollektivnye prava etnicheskih soobshchestv: problemy teorii i praktiki: sbor-niki nauchnyh trudov [Collective rights of ethnic communities: problems of theory and practice: collection of scientific papers]; ed. by Yu. V. Popkov, I. S. Tarbastaeva. Novosibirsk, Manuskript Publ., 2017. 196 p.
12. Boer A. A. Moral'no-pravovoj konflikt: teoriya i praktika razresheniya i sovershenstvovaniya [Moral and legal conflict: theory and practice of resolution and improvement]. St. Petersburg, GUAP Publ., 2015. 128 p.
13. Chase P. Conflict in crimea: an examination of ethnic conflict under contemporary model of sovereignty. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 1995, no. 34, pp. 219–254.
14. Mihajlov V. V. O nekotoryh protivorechiyah v opredelenii pravovogo statusa grupp (kollektivov) v sovremennoj zapadnoj i otechestvennoj teorii pravovoj zashchity [On some contradictions in determining the legal status of groups (collectives) in the modern Western and domestic theory of legal protection]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskoj yuridicheskoj akademii = Bulletin of the St. Petersburg Law Academy, 2021, no. 1 (50), pp. 15–20.
15. Sonh L. B. The new international law: protection of the rights of individuals rather than States. UN Law Review, 1982, vol. 10, is. 1, pp. 48.
16. Smith R. Stories of peoplehood: The politics and morals of political membership. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003. 236 p.
17. Jones P. Human rights, group rights and people’s rights. Human Rights Quaterly, 1999, vol. 21, pp. 78–83.
18. Mihajlov V. V. Pravovoj mekhanizm kompensacii za nespravedlivye dejstviya protiv grupp men'shinstv: avtonomiya i nacional'noe samoopredelenie kak formy zashchity kollektivnyh (gruppovyh) prav nacional'nyh men'shinstv [The legal mechanism of compensation for unfair actions against minority groups: autonomy and national self-determination as forms of protection of collective (group) rights of national minorities]. Zakon. Pravo. Gosudarstvo = Law. Right. State, 2020, no. 3 (26), pp. 294–303.
19. Antohina Yu. A., Boer V. M., Glushchenko P. P. Pravozashchitnaya deyatel'nost': teoriya i praktika zashchity prav, svobod i zakonnyh interesov cheloveka i grazhdanina [Human rights activity: theory and practice of protection of human and citizen rights, freedoms and legitimate interests]. St. Petersburg, GUAP Publ., 2016. 562 p.
Review
For citations:
Mikhailov V.V. The third Generation of Human Rights and the Issue of Legal Protection of the Russian-Speaking Population of Ukraine. Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law. 2021;11(5):10-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2021-11-5-10-18