Preview

Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law

Advanced search

On the Question of the Possibility of Renouncing Subjective Rights as a Result of Misconduct

https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2021-11-5-155-167

Abstract

Relevance. The rejection of subjective law is a phenomenon little studied in modern criminal procedure doctrine, as a result of which the question of the forms of behavior of participants in criminal proceedings, which determine the possibility of its implementation, remains unresolved. The definition of behavioral boundaries has both theoretical and practical significance: it contributes both to the enrichment of criminal procedure science, ensuring the proper level of legal protection of the individual in the field of criminal procedure relations, and acts as one of the guarantors of proper law enforcement.
The purpose of the study is to develop an author's approach to determining the possibility of renouncing the right through the unlawful behavior of a person who has fallen into the sphere of criminal proceedings and its legal consequences.
Objectives: to study doctrinal sources and judicial practice in order to establish the possibility of realizing the rejection of subjective law through both lawful and unlawful behavior; to identify the types of legal consequences of the rejection of subjective law, depending on the forms of behavior of a participant in criminal proceedings.
Methodology. The methodological basis of the research is the provisions of the general scientific dialectical method of cognition of the surrounding reality in its connection and interaction, the general scientific systematic approach. In the course of the work, formal legal, comparative methods and the method of observation were used.
Results. The conclusion is formulated that the rejection of the subjective right is possible only in the form of lawful behavior. Based on the author's vision of the nature of the behavior of a participant in criminal proceedings, which may underlie the rejection of subjective law, the concept of "criminal procedural punishment" is developed, its characteristics are given.
Conclusion. The waiver of the right is possible only on condition that the behavior of the participant in the criminal proceedings is lawful. Illegal behavior, expressed in the form of committing actions that violate the normal course of legal proceedings, naturally entails the reaction of the state in the form of depriving a citizen of his subjective right, which should be called "criminal procedural punishment".

About the Authors

Olesya S. Pashutina
Southwest State University
Russian Federation

Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Proceeding and Criminalistic

50 Let Oktyabrya str. 94, Kursk 305040



Irina V. Revina
Southwest State University
Russian Federation

Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Proceeding and Criminalistic

50 Let Oktyabrya str. 94, Kursk 305040



References

1. Kechek'yan S. F. Pravootnosheniya v socialisticheskom obshchestve [Legal relations in a socialist society]; ed. by M. S. Strogovich. Moscow, Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1958. 187 p.

2. Aleksandrov N. G. Zakonnost' i pravootnosheniya v sovetskom obshchestve [Legality and legal relations in Soviet society]. Moscow, Gosyurizdat Publ., 1955. 176 p.

3. Alekseev S. S. Obshchaya teoriya socialisticheskogo prava: kurs lekcij. Is. 2. Normy prava i pravootnosheniya [General theory of socialist law: course of lectures. Vol. 2. Norms of law and legal relations]; ed. by G. I. Petrishcheva. Sverdlovsk, Sredne-Ural'skoe kn. izd-vo, 1964. 226 p.

4. Ioffe O. S., Shargorodskij D. M. Voprosy teorii prava [Questions of the theory of law]. Moscow, Gosyurizdat Publ., 1961. 381 p.

5. Matuzov N. I. Lichnost'. Prava. Demokratiya [Personality. Rights. Democracy]. Saratov, Saratov Univ. Publ., 1972. 292 p.

6. Selivanova O. Yu. Sub"ektivnoe pravo: Sushchnost', struktura, cennost'. Diss. kand. yurid nauk [Subjective law: Essence, structure, value. Cand. legal sci. diss.]. Nizhnii Novgorod, 2001. 155 p.

7. Maslennikova L. N. Sub"ektivnye prava i yuridicheskie obyazannosti – vnutrisistemnye aktory, opredelyayushchie tendencii [Subjective rights and legal obligations - intra-system factors determining trends]. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O. E. Kutafina = Bulletin of the O. E. Kutafin University, 2018, no. 2, pp. 38–46.

8. Gambaryan A. S. Otkaz ot prava i voprosy ugolovno-processual'nogo vmeshatel'stva [Waiver of the right and issues of criminal procedural intervention]; ed. by A. V. Smirnov. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2018. 332 p.

9. P'yanov N. A. Pravovoe povedenie: ponyatie i vidy [Legal behavior: concept and types]. Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik = Siberian Legal Bulletin, 2004, no. 4, pp. 11–14.

10. Bogatyrev V. N. Otkaz v sovershenii notarial'nogo dejstviya i pravomernoe povedenie grazhdan [Refusal to perform a notarial act and lawful behavior of citizens]. Vestnik Saratovskoj yuridicheskoj akademii = Bulletin of the Saratov Law Academy, 2013, no. 4 (93), pp. 221–224.

11. Oksamytnyj V. V. Pravomernoe povedenie lichnosti (teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie problemy). Diss. dokt. yurid. nauk [Lawful behavior of a person (theoretical and methodological problems). Dr. legal sci. diss.]. Kiev, 1990. 374 p.

12. Kazakov V. N. Pravomernoe povedenie i pravoporyadok. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk [Lawful behavior and law and order. Cand. legal sci. diss.]. Moscow, 1999. 185 p.

13. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [Theory of State and law]; ed. by V. K. Babaev. 3th ed. Moscow, Yurajt Publ., 2019. 578 p.

14. Aleksandrov A. S., Kuhta A. A. Sudebnye fakty [Judicial facts]. Rossijskij sud'ya = Russian judge, 2007, no. 8, pp. 4–5.

15. Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Yu. Tolkovyj slovar' russkogo yazyka [Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language]. Available at: http://www. litmir.me/br/?b=123940&p=1 (accessed 05.06.2021)

16. Shcherbakov M. G. K voprosu o kvazisankciyah [On the issue of quasi-sanctions]. Vestnik yuridicheskogo fakul'teta Yuzhnogo federal'nogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Faculty of Law of the Southern Federal University, 2020, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 85–90.

17. Kaplunov A. I. Ob osnovnyh chertah i ponyatii gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya [About the main features and the concept of state coercion]. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and law, 2004, no. 12, pp. 10–17.

18. Fojnickij I. Ya. Uchenie o nakazanii v svyazi s tyur'movedeniem [The doctrine of punishment in connection with prison studies]. Moscow, Dobrosvet-2000 Publ., Gorodec Publ., 2000. 464 p.

19. Anoshchenkova S. A. Celi nakazaniya kak simvoly ugolovnoj politiki [The goals of punishment as symbols of criminal policy]. Vestnik Mordovskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Mordovian University, 2006, no. 1, pp. 16–24.

20. Fletcher Dzh., Naumov A. V. Osnovnye koncepcii sovremennogo ugolovnogo prava [Basic concepts of modern criminal law]. Moscow, Yurist Publ., 1998. 512 p.


Review

For citations:


Pashutina O.S., Revina I.V. On the Question of the Possibility of Renouncing Subjective Rights as a Result of Misconduct. Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law. 2021;11(5):155-166. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2021-11-5-155-167

Views: 147


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2223-1501 (Print)