To the Question of the Current Stage of Development of Political and Economic Research in Russian Political Science: "Political Economy" or "Economic Political Science"?
https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2021-11-5-167-178
Abstract
The relevance of the research topic is justified by the need to form a comprehensive understanding of the essence and content of modern economic relations and the role of state policy in their regulation, as well as the implementation of modern economic policy of the state, taking into account the existing system of state management of the economic sphere.
The purpose of the study is to analyze and generalize the experience of modern Russian political scientists in the latest research areas in modern Russian political science using the example of economic political science.
Objectives substantiation of the relevance of the development of economic political science as the most important, newest direction in the development of modern Russian political science; analysis of the positions of Russian scientists, representatives of political science regarding the subject of economic political science as a science and academic discipline; analysis of the state of representation of areas of training in economic political science, the discipline "Economic political science" in Russian educational institutions of higher education; justification of the need to introduce the discipline "Economic Political Science" for students of training areas in political science, public administration and economics
The research methodology is based on the author's approach, the author's hypothesis about the lack of political and economic research in modern Russian political science. The methods used are general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis of information, as well as political science and economic analysis.
Results. The urgency of the development of economic political science as the most important, newest direction of development of modern Russian political science and the need to introduce the discipline "Economic political science" for students of training areas in political science, public administration and economics are substantiated. The analysis of the positions of Russian scientists, representatives of political science regarding the subject of economic political science as a science and academic discipline is carried out.
Conclusion. The study made it possible to conclude that it is necessary to develop the direction of political and economic research in accordance with the provisions enshrined at the level of the order of the Ministry of Science and Education No. 118.
About the Author
Elena S. UstinovichRussian Federation
Doctor of Political Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Economics, Management and Humanities
70 Karl Marx str. Kursk 305004;
Head of the Kursk branch of the National Union of Political Scientists
References
1. Sychev N. V. Dialektika (logika) "kapitala" K. Marksa: k voprosam traktovki [Dialectics (logic) of K. Marx's "capital": to questions of interpretation]. Voprosy ekonomiki i prava = Questions of economics and law, 2018, no. 122, pp. 21–29.
2. Imanov N. M. Sovershenstvovanie socialisticheskogo prirodopol'zovaniya: (Politikoekonomicheskij analiz). Avtoref. diss. dokt. ekon. nauk [Improvement of socialist environmental management: (Political and economic analysis). Dr. econ. sci. abstract dis.]. Moscow, 1990.
3. Sychev N. V. Teoreticheskie osnovy mnogoukladnoj ekonomiki: Politiko-ekonomicheskie aspekty. Avtoref. diss. dokt. ekon. nauk [Theoretical foundations of a multi-layered economy: Political and economic aspects. Dr. econ. sci. abstract dis.]. Moscow, 2000. 47 p.
4. Bartosh N. F. Samoupravlenie trudovogo kollektiva pri perekhode k rynochnoj ekonomike: Politiko-ekonomicheskie problemy. Avtoref. diss. kand. ekon. nauk [Selfmanagement of the labor collective during the transition to a market economy: Political and economic problem. Dr. econ. sci. abstract dis.]. Rostov-on-Don, 1996. 23 p.
5. Erahtina I. A. Maloe predpriyatie trudovogo tipa: Politiko-ekonomicheskij aspect. Avtoref. diss. kand. ekon. nauk [Small labor-type enterprise: Political and economic aspect. Cand. econ. sci. abstract dis.]. Ivanovo, 2000. 18 p.
6. Zhabina I. V. Kommercheskij bank kak kvaziobshchestvennaya organizaciya: Politikoekonomicheskij aspect. Avtoref. diss. kand. ekon. nauk [Commercial bank as a quasi-public organization: Political and economic aspect. Cand. econ. sci. abstract dis.]. Ivanovo, 2004. 20 p.
7. Strahov A. I. Teoreticheskie osnovy obespecheniya bezopasnosti obshchestva: Politikoekonomicheskie aspekty. Avtoref. diss. dokt. ekon. nauk [Theoretical foundations of ensuring the security of society: Political and economic aspects. Dr. econ. sci. abstract dis.]. M., 2002. 46 p.
8. Babaev K. N. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost' regiona: Politiko-ekonomicheskij aspect. Avtoref. diss. kand. ekon. nauk [Economic security of the region: Political and economic aspect. Cand. econ. sci. abstract diss.]. Kostroma, 2000. 19 p.
9. Kochkurova E. V. Strukturnye izmeneniya v ekonomike sovremennoj Rossii: politikoekonomicheskie aspekty. Avtoref. diss. kand. ekon. nauk [Structural changes in the Economy of Modern Russia: Political and economic aspects. Cand. econ. sci. abstract diss.]. Moscow, 2012. 26 p.
10. Komolov O. O. Tendencii monopolizacii sovremennoj rynochnoj ekonomiki: politikoekonomicheskij aspect. Avtoref. diss. kand. ekon. nauk [Trends of monopolization of the modern market economy: political and economic aspect. Cand. econ. sci. abstract dis.]. Moscow, 2016. 27 p.
11. Kolobova G. A. Specifika politiko-gosudarstvennyh mekhanizmov regulirovaniya ekonomiki v sovremennoj Rossii. Avtoref. diss. dokt. polit. nauk [The specifics of political and state mechanisms of economic regulation in modern Russia. Dr. polit. sci. abstract dis.]. Kazan', 2014. 49 p.
12. Tarakanova T. S. Rossiya i Kitaj v Shanhajskoj organizacii sotrudnichestva: problemy politiko-ekonomicheskogo vzaimodejstviya. Avtoref. diss. kand. polit. nauk [Russia and China in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization: problems of Political and economic cooperation. Cand. polit. sci. abstract diss.]. St. Petersburg, 2017. 25 p.
13. Ustinovich E. S., Kulikov M. V. Politiko-administrativnye i ekonomiko-pravovye problemy razvitiya predprinimatel'stva v regionah Rossii (opyt Kurskoj oblasti) [Politicaladministrative and economic-legal problems of entrepreneurship development in the regions of Russia (experience of the Kursk region)]. Regional'nye problemy preobrazovaniya ekonomiki = Regional problems of economic transformation, 2020, no. 1, pp. 132–140.
14. Ustinovich E. S., Bochanov M. A. Politiko-ekonomicheskie bar'ery razrabotki gosudarstvennoj politiki po sozdaniyu institutov regional'nogo razvitiya [Political and economic barriers to the development of state policy on the creation of regional development institutions]. Problemy postsovetskogo prostranstva = Problems of the post-Soviet space, 2020, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 55–62.
15. Ustinovich E. S. Voprosy operacional'nogo opredeleniya kategorii "Gosudarstvennaya regional'naya ekonomicheskaya politika" i "Regional'naya ekonomicheskaya politika" v sovremennoj politicheskoj nauke [Issues of operational definition of the category "State regional economic policy" and "Regional economic policy" in modern political science]. Izvestiya YugoZapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i pravo = Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law, 2020, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 63–69.
16. Ustinovich E. S. Voprosy struktury kategorii "regional'naya ekonomicheskaya politika" v sovremennoj politicheskoj nauke [Questions of the structure of the category "regional economic policy" in modern political science]. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i pravo = Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law, 2020, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 123–128.
17. Ustinovich E. S. Politiko-ekonomicheskie bar'ery razrabotki gosudarstvennoj politiki po sozdaniyu institutov regional'nogo razvitiya [Political and economic barriers to the development of state policy on the creation of regional development institutions]. Problemy postsovetskogo prostranstva = Problems of the post-Soviet space, 2020, no. 1, pp. 55–63.
18. Bogaturov A. D. Ponyatie ekonomicheskoj politologii i osobennosti ee problemnogo polya v Rossii [The concept of economic political science and the features of its problem field in Russia]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya = Polis. Political studies, 2011, no. 4, pp. 8–19.
19. Kolobova G. A. O predmetnom pole ekonomicheskoj politologii [About the subject field of economic political science]. Vlast' = Power, 2016, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 156–159.
20. Il'icheva L. E., Komarovskij V. S. Predmetnoe pole ekonomicheskoj politologii [The subject field of economic political science]. Moscow, Aspekt-Press Publ., 2018. 240 p.
Review
For citations:
Ustinovich E.S. To the Question of the Current Stage of Development of Political and Economic Research in Russian Political Science: "Political Economy" or "Economic Political Science"? Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law. 2021;11(5):167-177. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2021-11-5-167-178