Problems of Differentiation of Responsibility for Facilitating Illegal Migration in the Light of the Decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the Qualification of Migration Crimes

Relevance. This article is devoted to the little-studied problem of the legal assessment of the promotion of illegal migration in the aspect of sectoral and intersectoral differentiation. The Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in its Resolution No. 18 of 09.07.2020 "On Judicial Practice in Cases of Illegal Crossing of the State Border of the Russian Federation and Crimes Related to Illegal Migration", which formed signs of organizing illegal migration, laid the foundations for an incorrect assessment of various crimes and torts in the migration sphere. This is the reason for the relevance of this article.
The purpose of the study is to formulate the author's definition of the sign "organization" in Article 322¹ of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation as a necessary condition for the formation of rules for the qualification of migration rights, which is a criterion for distinguishing these acts.
Objectives: to study doctrinal sources and judicial practice in order to identify shortcomings in its interpretation and application; to determine the content of the objective side of Article 322¹ of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation through the identification of intra-and intersectoral links with other migration violations.
Methodology. In the process of working on the research, both general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis) and methods of legal science (formal legal, comparative legal) were used.
Results. On the basis of the author's definition of the sign "organization" in Article 322¹ of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the rules for the qualification of migration crimes and torts are developed.
Conclusion. According to the results of the study, a general conclusion is made that the interpretation of the sign "organization" in Article 322¹ of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation through the use for these purposes in the doctrine and judicial practice of formulations such as" any actions "or" various actions " does not solve competition with related migration crimes and acts, the author's interpretation of this sign is proposed.

1. Cepelev V. F. Kvalifikaciya prestuplenij protiv poryadka upravleniya [Qualification of crimes against the order of management]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2015. 104 p.

2. Filippov P. A. Prestupleniya protiv poryadka upravleniya: zakon, teoriya, praktika [Crimes against the order of management: law, theory, practice]. Moscow, Zercalo-M Publ., 2017. 512 p.

3. Rashitov L. R. Prestupleniya protiv poryadka upravleniya migracionnoj deyatel'nost'yu v Rossijskoj Federacii: kriminologicheskij i ugolovno-pravovoj aspekty. Avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk [Crimes against the procedure for managing migration activities in the Russian Federation: criminological and criminal-legal aspects. Cand. legal. sci. abstract diss.]. Omsk, 2019. 23 p.

4. Byshevskij Yu. Yu. K voprosu o yuridicheskoj prirode ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti za organizaciyu nezakonnoj migracii [On the question of the legal nature of criminal liability for organizing illegal migration]. Rossijskij sledovatel' = Russian investigator, 2005, no. 6, pp. 14–19.

5. Golubeva E. R. Problemy otgranicheniya organizacii nezakonnoj migracii ot smezhnyh sostavov prestuplenij [Problems of distinguishing the organization of illegal migration from related crimes]. Vestnik Ufimskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the Ufa Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2018, no. 2 (80), pp. 24–26.

6. Dyadyun K. V. Otgranichenie prestupleniya, predusmotrennogo st. 3221 UK RF, ot smezhnyh administrativnyh prostupkov [Delineation of the crime provided for in Article 3221 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation from related administrative offenses]. Zakonnost' = Legality, 2012, no. 9 (935), pp. 57–62.

7. Kecherukov R. K. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za organizaciyu nezakonnoj migracii. Avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk. [Criminal liability for organizing illegal migration. Cand. legal sci. abstract diss.]. Krasnodar, 2009. 29 p.

8. Sasina E. N. K voprosu ob ugolovno-pravovyh aspektah organizacii nezakonnoj migracii [On the issue of criminal-legal aspects of the organization of illegal migration]. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Pravo = Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 2010, no. 20 (91), is. 14, pp. 152.

9. Iskhakov A. M. Ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie aspekty organizacii nezakonnoj migracii. Avtoref. kand. yurid. nauk [Criminal-legal and criminological aspects of the organization of illegal migration. Cand. legal. sci. abstract. diss.]. Kazan', 2018. 25 p.

10. Arhipcev N. I., Arhipcev I. N. Nezakonnoe peresechenie Gosudarstvennoj granicy Rossijskoj Federacii: osobennosti prestupnosti inostrannyh grazhdan i lic bez grazhdanstva [Illegal crossing of the State border of the Russian Federation: features of crime of foreign citizens and stateless persons]. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Pravo = Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 2010, no. 2 (73), is. 11, pp. 95–103.

11. Loboda V. V. Osobennosti kvalifikacii nezakonnogo peresecheniya Gosudarstvennoj granicy Rossijskoj Federacii v punkte propuska [Features of qualification of illegal crossing of the State border of the Russian Federation at the checkpoint]. Vestnik Sibirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta FSKN Rossii = Bulletin of the Siberian Law Institute of the Federal Drug Control Service of Russia, 2008, no. 2, pp. 177–178.

12. Niyazov Z. M. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za nezakonnoe peresechenie gosudarstvennoj granicy. Avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk [Criminal liability for illegal crossing of the state border. Cand. legal. sci. abstract diss.]. Bishkek, 2012. 26 p.

13. Ustinova T. D. Nezakonnoe peresechenie Gosudarstvennoj granicy RF [Illegal crossing of the state border of the Russian Federation]. Zakonnost' = Legality, 2006, no. 4 (858), pp. 15–18.

14. Shervani E. N. K. Ugolovno-pravovaya harakteristika prestuplenij, svyazannyh s nezakonnym peresecheniem Gosudarstvennoj granicy Rossijskoj Federacii [Criminal and legal characteristics of crimes related to illegal crossing of the State border of the Russian Federation]. Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki = Izvestiya Tula State University. Economic and legal sciences, 2013, no. 2, pt. 2, pp. 230–238.

15. Shcherbakov A. Problemy ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti za nezakonnoe peresechenie granicy [Problems of criminal liability for illegal border crossing]. Ugolovnoe pravo = Criminal Law, 2009, no. 5, pp. 106–111.

16. Bondarev S. P. Ugolovno-pravovaya ohrana otnoshenij v sfere grazhdanstva Rossijskoj Federacii i registracionnogo ucheta po mestu zhitel'stva i mestu prebyvaniya. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk [Criminal-legal protection of relations in the sphere of citizenship of the Russian Federation and registration at the place of residence and place of stay. Cand. legal. sci. diss.]. Krasnodar, 2016. 194 p.

17. Petrova I. A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za fiktivnuyu registraciyu i fiktivnuyu postanovku na uchet inostrannogo grazhdanina ili lica bez grazhdanstva [Criminal liability for fictitious registration and fictitious registration of a foreign citizen or a stateless person]. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki = Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art criticism. Questions of theory and practice, 2015, no. 9 (59), pt. 2, pp. 138–142.

18. Lajkova E. A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za prestupleniya protiv poryadka registracionnogo i migracionnogo ucheta. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk [Criminal liability for crimes against the order of registration and migration registration. Cand. legal. sci. diss.]. Irkutsk, 2021. 242 p.

19. Sasina E. N. Nekotorye problemy razgranicheniya administrativnoj i ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti po faktam nezakonnoj migracii [Some problems of differentiation of administrative and criminal responsibility on the facts of illegal migration]. Armiya i obshchestvo = Army and society, 2014, no. 1 (38), pp. 119–124.

20. Akimenko P. A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za narusheniya migracionnogo zakonodatel'stva grazhdanami Rossijskoj Federacii, inostrannymi grazhdanami i licami bez grazhdanstva. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk. [Criminal liability for violations of migration legislation by citizens of the Russian Federation, foreign citizens and stateless persons. Cand. legal. sci. diss.]. Tomsk, 2020. 260 p.

21. Byshevskij Yu. Yu. Yuridicheskaya priroda ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti za organizaciyu nezakonnoj migracii [The legal nature of criminal responsibility for organizing illegal migration]. Nauchnyj vestnik Omskoj akademii MVD Rossii = Scientific Bulletin of the Omsk Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2006, no. 1, pp. 39–44.

22. Vlasov Yu. A., Mihal' O. A. Kvalifikaciya nezakonnoj migracii [Qualification of illegal migration]. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2017. 182 p.