Use of the Potential of Operational-Search Activities in Solving Problems Stages of Initiation of a Criminal Case: Problemic Issues of Theory and Practice
https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2022-12-6-132-142
Abstract
Relevance. The article examines the main stages of the transformation of the legal model for initiating criminal cases on tax crimes, analyzes the changes introduced by Federal Law No. 51-FZ of 09.03.2022, returning a special “tax” reason to Article 140 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and adjusting the procedure for considering reports about the crime of the group in question. The problematic issues in the field of interaction between the preliminary investigation bodies and tax authorities in the course of identifying tax crimes and collecting the necessary evidence of the taxpayer's guilt are summarized.
The purpose of this study is to study topical issues of improving the procedural form of receiving and verifying reports of crimes in the context of traditional approaches to tax administration.
Objectives: analysis of the updated norms of tax and criminal procedural legislation, conceptual theoretical provisions that reflect the existing problems and contradictions in the legal regulation of the "tax" reason, its use in criminal procedural proof at the initial stage of the criminal process; development of proposals for optimization of criminal procedure legislation.
Methodology. When writing the article, the method of legal modeling, as well as logical, statistical, historical, comparative legal and other methods were used.
Results. The results of the study demonstrate the problems of legal regulation of the new procedure for initiating a criminal case on a tax crime and made it possible to formulate proposals for its improvement.
Conclusion. Based on the results of the study, the author states a change in the legal model for initiating criminal prosecution of unscrupulous taxpayers, when the effectiveness of solving crimes is replaced by a risk-based approach in the field of detecting tax crimes. It demonstrates the lack of common views in the assessments of such innovations, taking into account the existing experience of applying such a procedure in 2011-2014, a contradictory understanding of the role of tax audit materials in shaping the reason and grounds for initiating a criminal case, which makes it difficult to successfully use the results of tax control in criminal procedural proof.
About the Author
Yaroslava P. RyapolovaRussian Federation
Cand. of Sci. (Juridical), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics
50 let Oktyabrya Str. 94, Kursk 305040
Researcher ID: N-4594-2016
References
1. Privalov K. V. Nalogovaya prestupnost' v sovremennoj Rossii: sostoyanie i osnovnye napravleniya profilaktiki [Tax crime in modern Russia: the state and main directions of prevention]. Universum: Vestnik Gercenovskogo universiteta = Universum: Bulletin of Herzen University, 2013, no. 2, pp. 130–133.
2. Galimov E. R. Vozbuzhdenie ugolovnyh del po nalogovym prestupleniyam: perspektivy zakonodatel'nyh izmenenij [Initiation of criminal cases on tax crimes: prospects for legislative changes]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i pravo = Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Series: Economics and Law, 2014, no. 3, pp. 154–157.
3. Pajzulaev I. R. Novyj poryadok vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnyh del po nalogovym prestupleniyam [New procedure for initiating criminal cases on tax crimes]. Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta = Bulletin of the Vladimir Law Institute, 2015, no. 4, pp. 102–105.
4. Ryapolova Y. P. Aktual'nye voprosy vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnyh del o nalogovyh prestupleniyah [Topical issues of initiation of criminal cases on tax crimes]. Vestnik Volgogradskoj akademii MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2018, no. 4 (47), pp. 124–131.
5. Sevost'yanov I. A., Kulyukin S. L. Sovershenstvovanie mekhanizma privlecheniya k ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti za nalogovye prestupleniya [Improving the mechanism of criminal prosecution for tax crimes]. Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo social'no-ekonomicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Saratov State Socio-Economic University, 2017, no. 2 (66), pp. 81–83.
6. Pyatyshev Y. S. Sovremennoe sostoyanie ugolovnogo presledovaniya po delam o nalogovyh prestupleniyah [The current state of criminal prosecution in cases of tax crimes]. Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj akademii MVD Rossii = Legal Science and Practice: Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2013, no. 21, pp. 147–152.
7. Butorov A. N. Analiz zakonodatel'nyh novell, kasayushchihsya osobogo poryadka vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnyh del o nalogovyh prestupleniyah [Analysis of legislative novelties concerning a special procedure for the initiation of criminal cases on tax crimes]. Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj akademii MVD Rossii = Legal Science and Practice: Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2015, no. 2 (30), pp. 50–54.
8. Stel'mah V. Y. Osobennosti processual'nogo poryadka vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnyh del o nalogovyh prestupleniyah [Features of the procedural procedure for initiating criminal cases on tax crimes]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya Ekonomika i pravo = Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Series: Economics and Law, 2021, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 133–141.
9. Tyurin I. V. Komu doverit' dela o nalogovyh prestupleniyah? Novye iniciativy gosudarstva i staryj opyt v reshenii voprosa [Who should be entrusted with cases of tax crimes? New initiatives of the state and old experience in solving the issue]. Statistika i ekonomika = Statistics and economics, 2015, no. 6, pp. 46–49.
10. Stacenko V. G. Nekotorye problemnye voprosy vozbuzhdeniya i predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya ugolovnyh del o nalogovyh prestupleniyah [Some problematic issues of initiation and preliminary investigation of criminal cases of tax crimes]. Severo-Kavkazskij yuridicheskij vestnik = North Caucasian Legal Bulletin, 2016, no. 2, pp. 103–108.
11. San'kov V. I. [Verification of the arguments of the defense about the illegal initiation of a criminal case on a tax crime]. Protivodejstvie nalogovoj prestupnosti. Materialy Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii [Countering tax crime: materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference]; ed. by A. M. Bagmet. Moscow, Moskovskaya akademiya Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossijskoj Federacii, 2018, pp. 134–137 (In Russ.)
12. Ryapolova Y. P. Processual'nye vozmozhnosti uchastiya nalogovogo organa na etape vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnyh del o nalogovyh prestupleniyah [Procedural possibilities of participation of the tax authority at the stage of initiation of criminal cases on tax crimes]. Izvestiya YugoZapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i pravo = Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law, 2019, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 93–101.
13. Himicheva G. P. O sovershenstvovanii povodov dlya vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnyh del o nalogovyh prestupleniyah [On improving the reasons for initiating criminal cases on tax crimes]. Nauchnye trudy. Rossijskaya akademiya yuridicheskih nauk = Scientific works. Russian Academy of Legal Sciences, 2015, pp. 1228–1232.
14. Tabakova N. A. Problemy vyyavleniya i vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnyh del o nalogovyh prestupleniyah [Problems of detection and initiation of criminal cases on tax crimes]. Gumanitarnye, social'no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki = Humanities, socio-economic and social sciences, 2014, no. 5, pt. 1, pp. 262–267.
15. Zolotareva A. B., Kireeva A. V. Vozmozhnye puti reformirovaniya otvetstvennosti za narusheniya nalogovogo zakonodatel'stva [Possible ways to reform liability for violations of tax legislation]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava= Journal of Russian Law, 2016, no. 10 (238), pp. 121–133.
16. Ivanov Y. Novyj poryadok vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnyh del po nalogovym prestupleniyam. Kompleksnyj analiz [A new procedure for initiating criminal cases on tax crimes. Comprehensive analysis]. Energetika i pravo= Energy and Law, 2015, no. 2, pp. 54–57.
17. Zhidkova E. I. Novaya redakciya UPK RF: vozvrat k prezhnemu poryadku proizvodstva po ugolovnym delam o nalogovyh prestupleniyah? [New edition of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation: return to the previous procedure for criminal proceedings on tax crimes?]. Ugolovnoe pravo= Criminal law, 2015, no. 2, pp. 118–121.
18. Savchenko M. M. [Topical issues of identifying signs of tax crimes at the stage of making a decision on initiating a criminal case]. Protivodejstvie nalogovoj prestupnosti. MaterialyVserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii [Countering tax crime. Materials of the AllRussian Scientific and Practical Conference]; ed. by A. M. Bagmet. Moscow, Moskovskaya akademiya Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossijskoj Federacii, 2018, pp. 94–97.
19. Dubrovin V. V. Problemy dokazyvaniya viny po ugolovnym delam v svyazi s ukloneniem ot uplaty nalogov [Problems of proving guilt in criminal cases in connection with tax evasion]. Aktual'nye problemy rossijskogo prava = Actual problems of Russian law, 2019, no. 3 (100), pp. 170–176.
20. Matushkina N. V. Osobennosti vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnyh del po nalogovym prestupleniyam [Features of initiation of criminal cases on tax crimes]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i pravo = Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Series Economics and Law, 2017, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 140–146.
Review
For citations:
Ryapolova Ya.P. Use of the Potential of Operational-Search Activities in Solving Problems Stages of Initiation of a Criminal Case: Problemic Issues of Theory and Practice. Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law. 2022;12(6):132-142. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2022-12-6-132-142