The Doctrine of the Living Instrument and Evolutionary Interpretation in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights

Relevance. Having developed one of the most complex and advanced human rights protection practices in the world, the European Court of Human Rights has complicated its decision-making mechanism by introducing several doctrines, including the doctrine of the living instrument. The development of the doctrine of a living instrument and an evolutionary method of interpretation in the practice of the Court can be traced to some important cases and problems that have become key and determined the development of the future of the Court itself.

The purpose of the article is to analyze the doctrine of the living instrument, the specifics of its application in the practice of the ECHR.

Objectives: to analyze various approaches to the study of the nature of the doctrine of the living instrument, to identify trends in the development of evolutionary interpretation, as well as the opinions of various scientists on this issue.

Methodology. In the process of working on the study, systematic, comparative legal, historical and legal methods, as well as methods of interpretation, logical and structural analysis were used.

Results. It is noted that the concepts of «dynamic interpretation» and «evolutionary interpretation», «the doctrine of intertemporality» and the doctrine of a living instrument should be distinguished. At the same time, there is a risk that the doctrine of the living instrument may violate the sovereignty of Member States if it is used improperly. As a disadvantage, it is also highlighted that this doctrine may damage the legal certainty of the ECHR practice and create a situation where member States do not understand the scope of obligations to which they agree upon accession to the Convention. Based on the nature, it is proposed to divide the evolutionary rulings of the ECHR into 2 categories: rulings of an evolutionary nature and evolutionary rulings.

Conclusion. The author concludes that in performing its functions, the Court cannot but apply an evolutionary interpretation, but it must do so reasonably and consistently. The doctrine of the living instrument and the evolutionary interpretation as an instrument of its implementation are a reflection of the generation and those moral values that prevail in society at one time or another.

1. Letsas G. The ECHR as a living instrument: its meaning and legitimacy. Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European, and Global Context; ed. by A. Føllesdal, B. Peters, G. Ulfstein. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 106–141.

2. Nussberger A. The European Court of Human Rights. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022. 256 p.

3. Greer S. The European Convention on Human Rights: achievements, problems and prospects. Cambridge, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2006. 388 p.

4. Ispolinov A. S. Voprosy vzaimodeistvya mezhdunarodnogo i vnutrennego prava v resheniyakh Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF [Issues of interaction between international and domestic law in the decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation]. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal = Russian Law Journal, 2017, no. 1, pp. 73–93.

5. Helgesen J. E. What are the limits to the evolutive interpretation of the Convention? Dialogue between judges, European Court of Human Rights. Council of Europe, 2011, p. 22. URL: https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Dialogue_2011_ENG.pdf. (accessed 10.12.2023)

6. Helmersen S. T. Evolutive treaty interpretation: legality, semantics and distinctions. European Journal of Legal Studies, 2013, vol. 6, is. 1, pp. 127–148.

7. Harris D. J., O'Boyle M., Warbrick C. Law of the European Convention on Human Rights. 2th ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009. 902 p.

8. Schmahl S. The European Court of Human Rights – Can there be too much Success? A Comment. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2022, vol. 14, is. 1, pp. 191–203.

9. Merrills J. The development of international law by the European Court of Human Rights. Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1993. 235 p.

10. Jacobs F. G. The European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1975. 469 p.

11. Sorenson M. Do the rights set forth in the European Convention on Human Rights in 1950. Have the same significance in 1975. Fourth International Colloquy About the European Convention on Human Rights. Rome, 1975.

12. Dzehtsiarou K., O'Mahony C. Evolutive interpretation of rights provisions: a comparison of the European Court of Human Rights and the U.S. Supreme Court. Columbus Human Rights Law Review, 2013, vol. 44, pp. 309–365.

13. Fan Y. Revisiting ECtHR interpretation of the ECHR: living up to a living instrument. FISCAL Policy Brief Series, 2016, no. 65. URL: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/413852/1/17._Final_submission_of_thesis.pdf. (accessed 10.12.2023)

14. Webber T. The European Convention on Human Rights and the living instrument doctrine: An Investigation Into the Convention's Constitutional Nature and Evolutive Interpretation. Southampton, University of Southampton, 2016. URL: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/413852/1/17._Final_submission_of_thesis.pdf. (accessed 10.12.2023)

15. Encoklopediya Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka [Encyclopedia of the European Court of Human Rights]; ed. by V. Portnov. Moscow, Irga 5 Publ., 2018, vol. 1. 470 p.

16. Аndenas M., Bjorge E. National implementation of ECHR rights: kant’s categorical imperative and the Convention (April 22, 2011). University of Oslo Faculty of Law Research. Paper No. 2011-15. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1818845. (accessed 12.12.2023)

17. Arden M. An English Judge in Europe (Neill Lecture: 28 February 2014). URL: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Speeches/lj-arden-an-english-judge-ineurope.pdf. (accessed 12.12.2023)

18. Gavrilova Y. A. Ob evolutivnom tolkovanii v rosiyskom prave[On the evolutionary interpretation in Russian law]. Legal Concept = Pravovaya paradigma, 2021, vol. 20, no. 1.

19. Zorkin V. D. Nedostatki Konstitucii mozhno ustranit tochechnymi izmeneniyami [Shortcomings in the Constitution can be eliminated by point-by-point changes]. Rossiyskaya Gazeta = Russian newspaper, 2018, no. 226(7689). Available at: https://rg.ru/2018/10/09/zorkin-nedostatki-v-konstitucii-mozhnoustranit-tochechnymi-izmeneniiami.html. (accessed 12.12.2023)

20. Finnis J. Judicial law-making and the living instrumentalisation of the ECHR. Lord Sumption and the Limits of the law; ed. by N. Barber, R. Ekins, P. Yowell. Oxford, Portland, Oregon, Hart Publishing Ltd, 2016. 232 p.