The organization of provincial control bodies in 1920-1922: based on the materials of the Kursk region
https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2024-14-3-245-253
Abstract
Relevance. In modern conditions, the main directions of reforming control (supervisory) activities are to increase its efficiency and effectiveness, reduce the administrative burden on enterprises and entrepreneurs. The improvement of control (supervisory) activities remains relevant in the context of increased external sanctions pressure. At the same time, the history of the control system, which extended to all types and forms of public administration and economic activity, remains poorly understood in terms of existing regional experience. The study of the formation of control bodies in the Soviet state is of particular practical interest, since it allows accumulating achievements and mistakes of the past, thereby setting benchmarks in the present.
Purpose. The study of the experience of organizing socialist control bodies in 1920-1922 on the example of the Kursk provincial branch of the Workers' and Peasants' Inspection.
The objectives of the article follow from the set goal and consist in investigating the conditions and methods of work of the Kursk provincial department of the Workers' and Peasants' Inspection during the designated period.
Methodology. During the research of the designated topic, the author used both general scientific methods of cognition, such as analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, and special historical methods: problem-chronological, comparative historical.
Results. The study of the working conditions of the Kursk provincial department of the Workers' and Peasants' Inspection in the designated period allowed, in historical retrospect, to determine the specifics of the methods used by it, as well as to establish the reasons for the subsequent reforms.
Conclusion. The basis for the unification of party and Soviet state control was the analysis of the provincial experience of the RKI in 1920-1922. A significant obstacle to the broader development of both organizational and auditing activities of the Kursk Provincial Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences in the period under study was the insufficient number and low level of their training.
About the Author
D. S. NemkovaRussian Federation
Daria S. Nemkova, Post-Graduate Student of the Department of Constitutional Law
50 Let Oktyabrya Str. 94, Kursk 305040
References
1. Lenin V.I. Successes and difficulties of the Soviet government. In: Complete Works. Vol. 36: March-July 1918. Moscow: Izd-vo polit. lit.; 1974. 742 p. (In Russ.)
2. Dianov A.G. Workers' and peasants' inspection and the problem of control over the activities of the state apparatus in Siberia in 1920. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Tomsk State University. 2011;(346):64‒68. (In Russ.)
3. Dianov A.G. The activities of the Siberian workers' and peasants' inspectorate for the implementation of the principles of the NEP in 1922. Izvestiya Altajskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Proceedings of the Altai State University. 2011;(4-2):94‒99. (In Russ.)
4. Lepkova E.A. Activity of the provincial workers' and peasants' inspection in Tsaritsyn in 1920-1925. Voenno-istoricheskie aspekty zhizni Yuga Rossii XVII-XXI vv.: voprosy izucheniya i muzeefikacii: materialy IV Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, priurochennoj k 80-letiyu nachala kontrnastupleniya sovetskikh vojsk pod Stalingradom = Military-historical aspects of life in the South of Russia of the XVII-XXI centuries: issues of study and modernization: materials of the IV International Scientific and Practical Conference dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the beginning of the Soviet counteroffensive at Stalingrad. Volgograd: Gosudarstvennyj istoriko-memorialʹnyj muzej-zapovednik “Stalingradskaya bitva”; 2022. P. 276‒279. (In Russ.)
5. Kulikova S.A. The formation of national control in the USSR, forms and methods of its implementation (on the example of the Saratov Workers' and Peasants' Inspection in the first half of the 1920s). Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Eʹkonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo = Proceedings of the Saratov University. A new series. Series: Economics. Management. Right. 2021;21(4):429‒436. (In Russ.)
6. Kursk province workers' and peasants' inspection. On Guard of the Revolution: report of the Gubernia Department of the Workers' and Peasants' Inspection and Gubernia. Committee of the 8th Kursk Gubernatorial Congress of Soviets. Kursk: Red.-izd. kollegiya pri Kurskom gub. otd. upr., 1921. 31 p. (In Russ.)
7. GARF (State Archive of the Russian Federation). F. R-4085. Op. 2. D. 308. (In Russ.)
8. GAKO (State Archive of the Kursk region). F. R-321. Op. 1. D. 630. (In Russ.)
9. GARF. F. R-4085. Op. 2. D. 79. (In Russ.)
10. Kursk provincial economic meeting: report to the Council of Labor and Defense for the period April 1 to October 1, 1922. Kursk: Gos. izd-vo; 1922. 123 p. (In Russ.)
11. GARF. F. R-4085. Op. 2. D. 549. (In Russ.)
12. GARF. F. R-4085. Op. 2. D. 729. (In Russ.)
13. GAKO. F. R-321. Op. 1. D. 627. (In Russ.)
14. Lenin V.I. The report of the Central Committee on March 18. In: Complete works. Vol. 38: March ‒ July 1919. Moscow: Izd-vo polit. lit.; 1967. 580 p. (In Russ.)
15. The RSFSR. The People's com. the workers' and peasants' inspection. General instructions on the workers' and peasants' inspection: (Basic provisions). Moscow; 1920. 23 p. (In Russ.)
16. GAKO. F. R-321. Op. 1. D. 628. (In Russ.)
17. GAKO. F. R-321. Op. 1. D. 631. (In Russ.)
18. GAKO. F. R-321. Op. 1. D. 632. (In Russ.)
19. GAKO. F. R-321. Op. 1. D. 633. (In Russ.)
20. GAKO. F. R-321. Op. 1. D. 634. (In Russ.)
21. GARF. F. R-4085. Op. 2. D. 1126. (In Russ.)
22. GARF. F. R-4085. Op. 2. D. 939. (In Russ.)
23. Lenin V.I. Less is better, yes it is better. In: The complete works. Vol. 45: March 1922 ‒ March 1923. Moscow: Izd-vo polit. lit.; 1970. 730 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Nemkova D.S. The organization of provincial control bodies in 1920-1922: based on the materials of the Kursk region. Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law. 2024;14(3):245-253. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2024-14-3-245-253