Legal regulation of intellectual property protection for artificial neural networks
https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2024-14-4-61-74
Abstract
Relevance. Fundamental differences in the processes of development and maintenance of artificial neural networks from the algorithmic approach determine the relevance of the development of the existing scientific and methodological platform for solving technological and regulatory issues in the field of software development and legal protection of intellectual property of artificial intelligence systems.
The purpose of the study is to formulate scientifically based conclusions that determine the directions for solving the scientific problem of legal protection of intellectual property on artificial neural networks.
Objectives: to formulate a list of scientific tasks necessary for solving the scientific problem of legal protection of intellectual property rights to artificial neural networks; to develop proposals for improving the regulatory framework for registering intellectual property rights to artificial neural networks.
Methodology. The methodological basis of scientific research was the dialectical method of understanding the phenomena and processes of the surrounding reality.
Results. The obtained results of the study provide the opportunity to improve the regulatory framework establishing the basic principles of legal relations arising during the registration of intellectual property rights to artificial neural networks.
Conclusion. The solution to the problem of legal protection of intellectual property on artificial neural networks should be based on the improvement of the existing regulatory framework for the registration of intellectual property rights, as well as regulatory acts that determine the rules for registering and securing intellectual property rights to arrays of training sample data and (or) arrays of trained models of artificial neural networks, as well as to the topology of integrated circuits of neuromorphic processors.
About the Author
M. A. OgarokRussian Federation
Mikhail A. Ogarok, Post-Graduate Student
17/1 Serpukhovsky Val Str., Moscow 115191
References
1. Ershova I.V., Petrakov A.Yu., Tsimerman Yu.S. The doctrine of innovation law at the service of digital law. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O. E. Kutafina (MGYuA) = Courier of O. E. Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL). 2020;(11):191-201. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2020.75.11.191-201
2. Blazheev V.V. Preface. In: Blazheev V.V., Egorova M.A. (eds.) Legal regulation of artificial intelligence in the context of a pandemic and infodemic”. Moscow: Prospect; 2020. 240 p. (In Russ.)
3. Ruchkina G.V. Artificial intelligence, robots and robotic objects: on the issue of the theory of legal regulation in the Russian Federation. Bankovskoe pravo = Banking law. 2020;(1):7- 18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3945-2020-1-7-18
4. Morhat P.M. Artificial intelligence unit as an electronic person. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Yurisprudentsiya = Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University. Series: Jurisprudence. 2018;(2):61‒70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-6794-2018-2-61-73
5. Morhat P.M. Artificial intelligence: legal view. Moscow: Buki Vedi; 2017. 257 p. (In Russ.)
6. Ogarok A.L., Ogarok M.A., Zhavoronkova O.G. Technological and legal aspects of artificial intelligence. Informatizatsiya i svyaz' = Informatization and communication. 2023;(5):35– 39. https://doi.org/10.34219/2078-8320-2023-14-5-35-39
7. Starovoytov A.V., Bogdanov Yu.M., Ogarok A.L., Selivanov S.A. Analysis of heuristic and neuromathematical approaches to the development of algorithms and the creation of systems. Informatizatsiya i svyaz' = Informatization and communication. 2018;(1):7‒13. (In Russ.)
8. Ogarok A.L., Starikov P.P. Analysis of approaches to semantic processing of unstructured text information. Informatizatsiya i svyaz' = Informatization and communication. 2023;(4):42–46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34219/2078-8320-2023-14-4-42-46
9. Morhat P.M. Problems of patenting inventions created by an artificial intelligence unit. Zakon i pravo = Law and Right. 2018;(8):40‒43. (In Russ.)
10. Vasilevskaya L.Yu. Artificial intelligence: problems of civil-law qualification. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O. E. Kutafina (MGYuA) = Bulletin of the O.E. Kutafin University (MSAL). 2023;(5):32‒40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2023.105.5.032-040
11. Egorova M.A. The problem of legal protection of intellectual property objects created using digital technologies. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA) = Carier of Kutafin Moscow state Law University (MSAL). 2023;(1):32‒40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2023.101.1.127-138
12. Vasilevskaya L.Yu. (ed.) "Artificial Intelligence" and "artificial intelligence" technologies in contract law: civilistic concept. Moscow: Prospect; 2023. 336 p. (In Russ.)
13. Blazheev V.V., Egorova M.A. (eds.) Digital law. Moscow: Prospect; 2020. 640 p. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31085/9785392227297-2020-640
14. Artificial Intelligence and Civil Liability. European Parliament. Requested by the JURI committee. European Union. 133 p. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.2861/220466
15. Golovin K.S. Proposals for reforming the civil-legal protection of artificial intelligence as a single object of intellectual property. Aktual'nye problemy gosudarstva i prava = Actual problems of state and law. 2023;7(2):263-274. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-9340-2023-7-2-263-274
16. Bliznets I.A. (ed.) Intellectual property in the modern world. Moscow: Prospect; 2018. 672 p. (In Russ.)
17. Novoselova L.A. (ed.) Intellectual property law. T. 1. General provisions. Moscow: Statut; 2017. 512 p. (In Russ.)
18. Gurko A.V. On the possibility of legal protection of the results of "intellectual" activity of artificial intelligence systems. Ekonomika. Pravo. Obshchestvo = Economics. Law. Society. 2022;(1):71‒75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21686/2411-118X-2022-1-71-75
19. Tripathi S., Ghatak C. Artificial intelligence and intellectual property law. Christ University Law Journal. 2021;7:83‒98. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.12728/culj.12.5
20. Ezhov V. Neuromorphic systems as a tool for implementing artificial intelligence. Elektronika. Nauka. Tekhnologii. Biznes = Electronics. Science. Technologies. Business. 2021;(2):82‒92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22184/1992-4178.2021.203.2.82.9
Review
For citations:
Ogarok M.A. Legal regulation of intellectual property protection for artificial neural networks. Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law. 2024;14(4):61-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2024-14-4-61-74