On the question of the characterization of the traditional values of the Russian state

Relevance. Currently, the Russian state is in search of a positive model for building a sovereign state capable of countering global threats and challenges of our time, a special order of the world order that allows different countries to freely coexist and develop regardless of their size of territory, geographical location, military, demographic and resource potentials, political and socio-economic structure. In these conditions, it is particularly relevant to comprehend the existing political and legal experience of building Russian statehood and the establishment of a unified ideology based on traditional values.

The purpose of the study is to identify and analyze the constant constants that make up the traditional values of the Russian state.

Objectives: to identify the traditional values inherent in the national statehood; to give a general description of the identified traditional Russian values; to assess the possibility of applying traditional values of Russia to build a modern model of Russian statehood.

Methodology. The research used such methods of scientific cognition as historical, comparative methods, method of analysis, synthesis, generalization, systematization.

Results. The study found that in Russia such semantic constants as traditionalism, patriarchy, community, conciliarity and some others, reflected in modern domestic legal doctrine, were formulated as traditional values of Russian society and the state.

Conclusion. It has been established that the values of Russian statehood formed over the centuries can now become the basis for building an integral concept of the development of the modern Russian state, strengthening traditional Russian spiritual and moral constants, preserving the historical and cultural heritage of the multinational people of Russia, as well as for the formation of a stable and just world order, a multipolar system of international relations.

1. Vasil'ev A.A. The state-legal ideal of the Slavophiles. Moscow: In-t rus. civilizacii; 2010. 219 p. (In Russ.)

2. Ermashov D.V., Shirinjanc A.A. At the origins of Russian conservatism: N. M. Karamzin. Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta; 1999. 239 p. (In Russ.)

3. Uvarov S.S. The Decade of the Ministry of Public Education. 1833–1843 (note presented to the Sovereign Emperor Nikolai Pavlovich by the Minister of Public Education of the gr. Uvarovym in 1843). St. Petersburg: Tip. Imp. akad. nauk; 1864. 161 p. (In Russ.)

4. Pogodin M.P. Essays: historical and political letters and notes in the continuation of the Crimean War. Moscow: Sinod. tip; 1874. 388 p. (In Russ.)

5. Chapaeva L.G., Dibrova E.I. Slavophiles and Westerners in the Russian cultural and linguistic situation of the 1830s-1840s. Moscow: Mosk. gos. gumanitarnyi un-t; 2007. 241 p. (In Russ.)

6. Bleher L.I. The main Russian dispute: from Westerners and Slavophiles to Globalism and the New Middle Ages. M.: Akad. Proekt: In-t Fonda obshhestv. mnenie; 2003. 604 p. (In Russ.)

7. Kuzubova A.Ju. The doctrine of conciliarity in the legal doctrine of Russian conservatism. Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika = Law and the state: theory and practice. 2023;(4):41–44. (In Russ.)

8. Bagdasaryan V.Ye., Resnyanskij S.I. The collection "Milestones" in the context of public controversy about the ways of development of Russia: the experience of introspective analysis. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Istoriya Rossii = Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. The history of Russia. 2015;(1):21–42. (In Russ.)

9. Podol'skij V.A. «The social question» in the political philosophy of N.A. Berdyaev, S.N. Bulgakov and S.L. Frank: a comparative analysis of concepts. Filosofskaja mysl' = Philosophical Thought. 2023;(12):53–69. (In Russ.)

10. Vasil'ev A. A. The essence of the protective legal doctrine. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo = Bulletin of the Voronezh State University. Series: Law. 2011;(1):111–123. (In Russ.)

11. Shirokorad A.B. The Millennial battle of IA Tsargrad. Moscow: Veche; 2005. 672 p. (In Russ.)

12. Kristalinskij L.B. Ethnopolitics as a sphere of ensuring state security in the conditions of multinational border space of Russia. Gumanitarnye, social'no-ekonomicheskie i obshhestvennye nauki = Humanities, socio-economic and social sciences. 2014;(5–1):170–174. (In Russ.)

13. Filatov S.B., Lunkin R.N. Statistics of Russian religiosity: the magic of numbers and ambiguous reality. Rossiya i musul'manskij mir = Russia and the Muslim world. 2005;(10):42– 53. (In Russ.)

14. Gurskaja N.V. Patriarchal customs as an integral factor in the formation of original cultural elements Ural (Yaitsky) Cossacks. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University. 2010;(16):74–82. (In Russ.)

15. Antonov D.A. Conciliarity and community as the most important definitions of the identity of Russian society. Srednerusskij vestnik obshhestvennyh nauk = Central Russian Bulletin of Social Sciences. 2013;(3):7–13. (In Russ.)

16. Polatajko S.V. Russian traditionalism as a principle of Russian modernization. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Filosofiya i konfliktologiya = Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Philosophy and conflictology. 2017;(1):119–124. (In Russ.)

17. Nosov I.P. The role of traditions in the legal culture of Russian society. Logos et Praxis. 2011;(3):115–119. (In Russ.)

18. Bagdasaryan V.Ye. Traditional values and new worldview building in Russia: problems and solutions. Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta prosveshheniya. Seriya: Istoriya i politicheskie nauki = Bulletin of the State University of Education. Series: History and Political Sciences. 2024;(1):8–25. (In Russ.)

19. Shhennikova K.Ju. Traditional values as a factor of preservation and unity of modern Russia. Rossiya: tendencii i perspektivy razvitiya = Russia: trends and prospects of development. 2016;(11–3):686–688. (In Russ.)

20. Ajvazjan S.A. The Russian Federation as a super-presidential republic. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo = Economics and entrepreneurship. 2021;(6):215–218. (In Russ.)