Family law and gender imbalance: criteria for protecting fathers' rights in the context of law enforcement conflicts

The relevance of the study is related to the absence in Russian legal doctrine of a comprehensive analysis of the causes of law enforcement asymmetry, including the subjective interpretation of the “interests of the child” and the lack of procedural criteria for assessing parental competence. The practical significance of the work lies in its focus on the harmonization of legislation and law enforcement practice, which corresponds to the goals of protecting the rights of the child.

Objective. The study is aimed at identifying systemic legal barriers that limit the implementation of paternal rights in judicial practice and developing recommendations for amending family legislation to minimize gender bias in determining a child's place of residence.

Objectives. To identify discriminatory patterns in disputes about the place of residence of the child through the analysis of judicial practice, to analyze the conflicts of application of the norms of the Family Code of the Russian Federation on the equality of parents and to propose mechanisms to eliminate gender biases in jurisdictional activity.

Methodology. The study is based on the synthesis of comparative legal analysis of judicial practice, qualitative case study and systematic approach to the assessment of law enforcement conflicts within the framework of the norms of the Family Code of the Russian Federation, aimed at minimizing subjectivity in determining the place of residence of a child.

Results. The analysis of more than 120 court decisions revealed that in 73% of cases fathers were refused to change the child's place of residence due to stereotypical perception of parental roles, despite the presence of evidence of their competence. We developed criteria for assessing the “interests of the child” (attachment, conditions of upbringing, psychological expertise) and proposed amendments to Article 66 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation, enshrining the presumption of joint custody as a mechanism for minimizing gender bias.

Conclusion. The study confirmed the existence of systemic discrimination against fathers in judicial practice due to gender stereotypes and gaps in the interpretation of the norms of the Family Code of the Russian Federation. As a legal solution, a model of harmonization of legislation through the presumption of joint custody, standardization of parental competence assessment and amendments to Article 66 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation is proposed.

1. Yakushev P.A. The scientific legacy of Yuri Fedorovich Bespalov as a doctrinal basis for improving family legislation and law enforcement practice. Social'no-yuridicheskaya tetrad' = Socio-legal Notebook. 2021;(11):22-35. (In Russ.)

2. Tarusina N.N. Family: value and formal legal guidelines. Demidovskij yuridicheskij zhurnal = Demidovsky Law Journal. 2023;13(3):364-381. (In Russ.)

3. Zykov S.V. The exercise of the right of paternity in modern Russia: law enforcement and legislative obstacles. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki = Right. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2020;(3):44-71. (In Russ.)

4. Emelina L.A., Yavorskij S.A. Fathers without the right to fatherhood: family and legal mechanisms for balancing the interests of fathers and children. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i pravo = Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law. 2024;14(6):90-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2024-14-6-90-102.

5. Reutov S.I. Legal issues of resolving disputes about the place of residence of children in case of separation of parents. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki = Bulletin of Perm University. Legal Sciences. 2010;(2):142-148. (In Russ.)

6. Mamedova M.K. Specifics of the execution of court decisions in cases of determining the child's place of residence. Yuridicheskij vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Law Bulletin of Dagestan State University. 2012;(2):48-52. (In Russ.)

7. Dergunova V.A. Features of the application of the Declaration of the rights of the child by the courts in resolving disputes between parents about the place of residence of children. Advokat = Lawyer. 2016;(11):50-54. (In Russ.)

8. Nadin I.N. Problems of judicial proceedings in cases of divorce in the presence of disputes about children. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law. 2022;26(8):135-147. (In Russ.)

9. Vaske E.V., Safuanov F.S., Sekerazh T.N. Why does psychological and pedagogical expertise in disputes related to the upbringing of children not meet the needs of justice. Teoriya i praktika sudebnoj ekspertizy = Theory and practice of forensic examination. 2020;15(1):6-19. (In Russ.)

10. Bogdan V.V. Protection of traditional family values in the paradigm of transformation of family relations: balancing on the edge. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo = Bulletin of Tver State University. Series: Law. 2024;(2):71-79. (In Russ.)

11. Zykov S.V. Parental rights to determine the child's place of residence and the order of communication with him: problems of theory and practice. Aktual'nye problemy rossijskogo prava = Current problems of Russian law. 2022;17;(3):75-83. (In Russ.)

12. Danilenkov A. V. The age qualification of a child as one of the ways to unlawfully restrict the rights of fathers in the Russian Federation. Semejnoe i zhilishchnoe pravo = Family and housing law. 2013;(2):10-15. (In Russ.)

13. Kuznecova O.V. Protection of fathers' rights under family law. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University. 2015;(17):89-94. (In Russ.)

14. Kozlova N.A., Trofimova M.S. Legal problems of paternity protection in modern Russia. Semejnoe i zhilishchnoe pravo = Family and housing law. 2021;(3):6-10. (In Russ.)

15. Sinel'nikov A.B., Dorohina O.V. What does the unlimited right to divorce lead to? Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18: Sociologiya i politologiya = Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 18: Sociology and Political Science. 2015;(3):79-94. (In Russ.)

16. Zubenko V.M. On the right of a minor child to protection from unlawful separation from his mother: problems of legal understanding and law enforcement. Pravo i sovremennye gosudarstva = Law and modern States. 2017;(1):19-25. (In Russ.)

17. Ul'yanova M.V. The exercise of family rights and duties in the structure of family relations. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki = Bulletin of Perm University. Legal Sciences. 2024;(63):112-133. (In Russ.)

18. Nechaeva A.M. Family law. Mopscow: Yurajt; 2020. 294 p. (In Russ.)

19. Ryzhenkov A.Ya. The principle of state protection of the family, motherhood, fatherhood and childhood: issues of theory and practice. Nauchnyj vestnik Volgogradskogo filiala RANHiGS. Seriya: Yurisprudenciya = Scientific Bulletin of the Volgograd branch of the RANEPA. Series: Jurisprudence. 2019;5(2):10-16. (In Russ.)

20. Emelina L.A., Yavorskij S.A. Actual problems of protection of housing rights of minors. In: Detstvo ‒ territoriya bezopasnosti: sbornik materialov konferencii = Childhood is a security territory: collection of conference materials. Moscow: Centr vynuzhdennyh pereselencev "Saratovskij istochnik"; 2023. P. 142-145. (In Russ.)

21. Nizhnik N.S., Burdanova N.A. Judicial disputes related to the exercise of personal nonproperty parental rights and duties in the Russian Federation. In: Problemy grazhdanskogo prava i processa: sbornik nauchnyh statej = Problems of civil law and the process: collection of scientific articles. Is. 5. Grodno: Grodnenskij gos. un-t im. Yanki Kupaly, 2020. P. 207-214. (In Russ.)