Preview

Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law

Advanced search

A critical view at the imposition of administrative punishments in simplified judicial proceedings

https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2025-15-1-39-50

Abstract

Relevance. The study of the judicial procedure for the imposition of administrative punishments is particularly relevant in connection with the widespread discussion in the theory of administrative law and procedure about the role of the court as an administrative jurisdiction body, rethinking the understanding of justice in administrative cases, as well as the need to optimize the court workload associated with the consideration of cases of administrative offenses.

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate a critical assessment of the imposition of administrative punishments by courts in simplified judicial proceedings.

Objectives. To achieve the purpose of the study, the following tasks were set: to give a general description of simplified judicial proceedings, to identify the signs of simplified judicial proceedings in cases of administrative offenses, to characterize some of the problems of implementing the procedure for imposing administrative punishments in simplified judicial proceedings, to give a critical assessment of simplified judicial proceedings in relation to the essence of the institution of administrative liability.

Methodology. The methodological basis of the research includes general scientific techniques and methods of cognition, as well as special and private scientific methods, including dialectical, formal legal (dogmatic), historical, etc.

Results. The study demonstrates the inconsistency of simplified judicial proceedings with the essence of the institution of administrative liability and justice in cases of bringing to public liability, as well as the inexpediency of appealing to justice to resolve the issue of imposing administrative punishments in cases currently being considered by arbitration courts in simplified proceedings.

Conclusion. The author of the article puts forward the thesis about the need to abolish simplified judicial proceedings in cases of administrative offenses and transfer cases considered by arbitration courts in simplified proceedings to the jurisdiction of non-judicial public authorities by applying the criterion proposed by the author.

About the Author

M. Yu. Stazhila
Russian State University of Justice
Russian Federation

Maksim Y. Stazhila, Postgraduate Student of the Department of Administrative Law and Procedure

69 Novocheremushkinskaya Str., Moscow 117418

AuthorID: 1253922



References

1. Terekhova L. Court proceedings for imposition of administrative sanctions. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review. 2018;2(3):110-116. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-514.2018.2(3).110-116.

2. Savelieva T.A. Simplified proceedings in the arbitration process and its place in the system of arbitration procedural law. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii = Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin. 2020;(6):177-182. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2227-7315-2020-10170.

3. Solokhin A.E. Simplified (expedited) proceedings in civil and arbitrazh procedure: history, issues and prospects. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii = Bulletin of Economic Justice of the Russian Federation. 2015;(8):135-157. (In Russ.)

4. Dolotin R.R. Study of the procedural form of simplified proceedings in the context of the problem of implementation of the principle of procedural economy. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure. 2021;(3):212-223. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-3-212-223.

5. Solomeina E.A. Simplified proceedings in arbitration: ways of improvement. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitrazh and civil procedure. 2018;(7):38-40. (In Russ.)

6. Morozova N.A. Consideration by arbitration courts of cases of administrative offenses in simplified proceedings: problems and contradictions. In: Aktual'nye problemy nauki administrativnogo prava i administrativnogo protsessa: sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoprakticheskoi konferentsii «Lazarevskie chteniya – 2022» = Actual problems of the science of administrative law and administrative process : collection of materials of the International Scientific and practical Conference «Lazarev Readings – 2022». Moscow: Institut gosudarstva i prava RAN; 2022. P. 309-313. (In Russ.)

7. Zueva L.Yu. On the legal nature of summary administrative offense proceedings. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess = Administrative Law and Procedure. 2024;(4):43-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18572/2071-1166-2024-4-43-46.

8. Zueva L. Yu. Types of administrative offense proceedings. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess = Administrative Law and Procedure. 2024;(7):43-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18572/2071-1166-2024-7-43-49.

9. Pankova O.V. Justice in cases of administrative offenses in courts of general jurisdiction. Moscow: Statut; 2023. 450 p. (In Russ.)

10. Grishkovets A.A. Consideration by courts of general jurisdiction of cases about administrative offences is not a justice. Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn' = Legal policy and legal life. 2023;(1):73-87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/1608-8794-2023-1-73-87.

11. Golovko L.V. Delineation of administrative and criminal liability under Russian Law. Lex Russica. 2016;(1):139-145. (In Russ.)

12. Tereshkova V.V. Reform of administrative offences proceedings in the context of ECHR legal positions. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo = Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law. 2018;(3):197-212. (In Russ.)

13. Morozova N.A. Inadmissibility of summary hearing of administrative offense cases by commercial courts. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitrazh and civil procedure. 2021;(4):23-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383X-2021-4-23-26.

14. Gromoshina N.A. On the unity of the procedure and the role of administrative proceedings in the russian law system: Continuation of the discussion. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess = Administrative Law and Procedure. 2018;(3):42–46. (In Russ.)

15. Stakhov A.I. Administrative procedure as a structural element of the integrative theory of the administrative process. In: Kaplunov A.I. (ed.) Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo i administrativno-protsessual'nogo prava (Sorokinskie chteniya): sbornik statei po materialam Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii = Actual problems of administrative and administrative procedure law (Sorokin Readings): collection of articles based on the materials of the International scientific and practical conference. St. Peresburg: S.-Peterb. un-t Ministerstva vnutrennikh del RF; 2023. P. 453‒468. (In Russ.)

16. Kurokhtin Yu.A. The principle of adversarial proceedings in the Russian Federation : a constitutional and legal aspect. Moscow: RAP; 2009. 160 p. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Stazhila M.Yu. A critical view at the imposition of administrative punishments in simplified judicial proceedings. Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law. 2025;15(1):39-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2025-15-1-39-50

Views: 93


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2223-1501 (Print)