The Practice of Theatrical Touring Activities in Rural Areas in the Context of the Social Functioning of the Regional Theater in 1964–1985
https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2022-12-1-194-203
Abstract
Relevance. The appeal to the touring activity of the theaters of the Urals during the period of late socialism was dictated by the crisis state of modern society, in the spiritual culture of which there was a noticeable tendency to a decrease in aesthetic tastes and a change in aesthetic guidelines. The historical experience of broadcasting artistic values among the rural population, inherent in theater groups in the Soviet era, can be useful in ensuring the foundations of spiritual security today, introducing various social strata of the population to high professional art.
The purpose of the research is to study the practical experience of rural touring activities of the theaters of the Urals in the conditions of directive management of the sphere of culture in 1964 - 1985.
Objectives. Based on the archival regional source material, the following tasks are formulated in the article: to characterize the volume of theatrical services in the village; to study new forms and methods of touring work of theatrical groups of the Urals in rural areas; to identify essential signs of touring practice in the countryside on a regional scale.
Methodology. The methodological basis of the research is a system-historical approach, comparative-historical and system methods, as well as a retrospective method in synergy with universal logical methods - analysis, synthesis, comparison and modeling.
Results. The touring activity was carried out in accordance with the ideologized policy of the party, at the expense of state funding and was justified, both in ideological and general cultural plans, which made it possible to develop this socially significant theatrical phenomenon. In the late Soviet period, an increase in the volume, quantitative and qualitative indicators of rural tours of professional theaters was recorded in the Urals. The geography of tours of Ural theaters is expanding.
Conclusion. Touring practices allowed theaters to do a great job of promoting the best works of theatrical art to rural viewers who live geographically far from professional art institutions. Party-state policy has defined clear boundaries for theaters of their activities, both ideologically and productively, while encouraging and financing rural tours.
About the Author
Svetlana A. ZaelskayaRussian Federation
Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of General History and Methods of Teaching History and Social Science
14 Soviet str., Orenburg 460014
References
1. Iskenderov M. E. Organizatsiya dosuga selskikh zhiteley v 60–70-e gg. XX v. [Organization of leisure time for rural residents in the 60s – 70s. XX century]. Vestnik instituta IAE = Bulletin of the Institute of the IAE, 2016, no. 1, pp. 78–81.
2. Syzdykova Zh. S., Dosova B.A. Politika sovetskoy vlasti po organizatsii dosuga grazhdan v 1950–1960 gg. (na materialakh Tsentralnogo Kazakhstana) [The policy of the Soviet government on organizing the leisure of citizens in the 1950-1960s. (based on materials from Central Kazakhstan)]. Voprosy natsionalnykh i federativnykh otnosheniy = Questions of national and federal relations, 2019, vol. 9, no. 5(50), pp. 566–572.
3. Krylovskaya I. I. [Repertoire policy and the problem of reporting in the Khabarovsk regional theater of musical comedy]. Kultura Dalnego Vostoka Rossii i stran ATR: Vostok-Zapad. Materialy XXIII nauchnoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiyem [Culture of the Far East of Russia and Asia-Pacific countries: East-West. Proceedings of the XXIII scientific conference with international participation]. Vladivostok, Dalnauka Publ., 2017, pp. 282–288.
4. Troyakova Yu. K. Osobennosti raboty partiynykh organov Khakasii po osushchestvleniyu teatralnoy politiki v 1980–1991 gg. [Features of the work of the party organs of Khakassia on the implementation of theatrical policy in 1980-1991.]. Vestnik Cherepovetskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Cherepovets State University, 2012, no. 4, vol. 1, pp. 36–41.
5. Tuzova O. V. Muzykalnaya kultura Povolzhia v kontse 1930-kh – pervoy polovine 1940-kh gg. [Musical culture of the Volga region in the late 1930s – the first half of the 1940s]. Samara, Samara St. Eng. Univ. Publ., 2020. 348 p.
6. Kommunisticheskaya partiya Sovetskogo Soyuza v rezolyutsiyakh i resheniyakh syezdov, konferentsiy i plenumov TsK [The Communist Party of the Soviet Union in resolutions and decisions of congresses, conferences and plenums of the Central Committee]. Vol. 12, 1975–1977. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1978. 605 p.
7. Istoriya kultury Bashkortostana. Vyp. 5. Kulturnaya zhizn v Bashkortostane. Sbornik dokumentov i materialov. 1960–1994 gg. [The history of culture of Bashkortostan. Issue 5. Cultural life in Bashkortostan. Collection of documents and materials. 1960–1994]. Ufa, Gilem Publ., 1995. 330 p.
8. TsGAUR (Tsentralnyy gosudarstvennyy arkhiv Udmurtskoy respubliki) [Central State Archives of the Udmurt Republic], f. R-1105, op. 2, d. 56.
9. Vanyukov D. A. Epokha zastoya [The era of stagnation]. Moscow, Mir knigi Publ., 2008. 240 p.
10. GAPK (Gosudarstvennyy arkhiv Permskogo kraya) [State Archives of the Perm Territory], f. R-1680, op. 1, d. 14.
11. OGAChO (Obyedinennyy gosudarstvennyy arkhiv Chelyabinskoy oblasti) [United State Archives of the Chelyabinsk Region], f. 1632, op. 1, d. 47.
12. GASO (Gosudarstvennyy arkhiv Sverdlovskoy oblasti) [State Archives of the Sverdlovsk Region], f. R-240, op. 1, d. 645.
13. OGAOO (Obyedinennyy gosudarstvennyy arkhiv Orenburgskoy oblasti) [United State Archives of the Orenburg Region], f. 2568, op. 1, d. 1113.
14. TsGAUR, f. R-1490, op. 1, d. 314.
15. TsDOOSO (Tsentr dokumentatsii obshchestvennykh organizatsiy Sverdlovskoy oblasti) [Center for Documentation of Public Organizations of the Sverdlovsk Region], f. 4, op. 98, d. 313.
16. OGAOO, f. 371, op. 83, d. 29.
17. TsDOOSO, f. 334, op. 1, d. 22.
18. GASO, f. R-2354, op. 1, d. 982.
19. PGANI (Permskiy gosudarstvennyy arkhiv noveyshey istorii) [Perm State Archive of Contemporary History], f. 8197, op. 1, d. 553.
20. GAOO, f. R-2568, op. 1, d. 856.
21. NARB (Natsionalnyy arkhiv Respubliki Bashkortostan) [National Archives of the Republic of Bashkortostan], f. R-1910, op. 2, d. 330.
22. Zayelskaya S. A. Osnovnyye napravleniya deyatelnosti professionalnykh teatrov Urala po kulturnomu obsluzhivaniyu selskogo zritelya v 1970-e gg. [The main activities of the professional theaters of the Urals for the cultural services of the rural audience in the 1970s.]. Gosudarstvennaya vlast i krestianstvo v XIX – nachale XXI veka [State power and the peasantry in the nineteenth and early twenty-first centuries: a collection of articles]. Moscow, Institut istorii RAN Publ., 2020, pp. 303–308.
23. OGAChO, f. P-288, op. 195, d. 268.
Review
For citations:
Zaelskaya S.A. The Practice of Theatrical Touring Activities in Rural Areas in the Context of the Social Functioning of the Regional Theater in 1964–1985. Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law. 2022;12(1):194-203. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2022-12-1-194-203