With Regard to the Legal Uncertainty of the Procedure for the Placement of Juveniles in Special Closed Educational Institutions, at the Request of the Prosecutor
Abstract
Relevance. The item is devoted an actual problem of placing juveniles in educational institutions of closed type by application of the Prosecutor. Analysis of the current legislation regulating legal relations in this area indicates the legal uncertainty this procedure at the request of the Prosecutor.
The purpose of the work is to study the procedure for placing juveniles in educational institutions at the request of the Prosecutor.
The objectives of the study are to identify and scientifically analyze the problems of the procedure for placing juveniles in special educational institutions at the request of the Prosecutor.
Methodology In the process of work on the study, analytical, comparative legal scientific research methods were used, as well as the method of legal modeling, which showed that the current legislation does not regulate the procedure for placing adolescents in closed educational institutions and made it possible to determine measures aimed to improve Russian legislation in the field of regulation of the activities of law enforcement agencies.
The results of the study revealed gaps in the legislation governing the placement of juveniles in special teaching and educational institution to the Prosecutor in the absence of regulation on the procedure of medical, including psychiatric examination and comprehensive examination of psychological-medical-pedagogical Commission of the category of minors at direction of materials in court by the Prosecutor.
Conclusion. The article concludes that it is indispensably to make appropriate changes to the law that would allow us to overcome the statutory uncertainty of this procedure.
About the Author
Kseniya A. Sapronova
Russian State University of Justice;
Moscow Prosecutor’s Office
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Post-Graduate Student
69 Novocheremushkinskaya str., Moscow 117418;
Prosecutor
1 Krestyanskaya Zastava square, Moscow 109992, GSP-2
References
1. Bezhencev A. A. Evolyuciya otechestvennyh gosudarstvennyh organov po profilaktike beznadzornosti i pravonarushenij nesovershennoletnih [Evolution of domestic state bodies for the prevention of neglect and juvenile delinquency]. Voprosy yuvenal'noj yusticii = Issues of Juvenile Justice, 2013, no. 2, pp. 3–6.
2. Vinokurov A. Yu. Rabota prokurora po preduprezhdeniyu pravonarushenij [The work of the prosecutor on the prevention of offenses]. Prokurorskij nadzor [Prosecutor's supervision]; ed. by O. S. Kapinus. 3 th ed. Moscow, Yurajt Publ., 2016, vol. 2, pp. 313–319.
3. Voevodina T. G. Profilaktika pravonarushenij i prokurorskij nadzor: problematichnye novelly zakonodatel'stva [Prevention of offenses and prosecutor's supervision: problematic novelties of legislation]. Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika = Legislation and Economics, 2016, no. 9, pp. 58–62.
4. Gulyagin A. Yu., Bozoyan A. O. Nesovershenstvo pravovogo regulirovaniya statusa prokurora kak koordinatora i sub"ekta profilaktiki pravonarushenij [Imperfection of the legal regulation of the prosecutor's status as a coordinator and subject of crime prevention]. Rossijskaya yusticiya = Russian Justice, 2017, no. 8, pp. 55–58.
5. Skripchenko N. Yu. Istoriya stanovleniya i razvitiya zakonodatel'stva, reguliruyushchego pomeshchenie nesovershennoletnego v special'noe uchebno-vospitatel'noe uchrezhdenie zakrytogo tipa [The history of the formation and development of legislation regulating the placement of a minor in a special educational institution of a closed type]. Pravo i obrazovanie = Law and Education, 2014, no. 10, pp. 150–159.
6. Shestakova E. V. Rol' centrov vremennogo soderzhaniya nesovershennoletnih pravonarushitelej i special'nyh uchebno-vospitatel'nyh uchrezhdenij zakrytogo tipa v sisteme profilaktiki pravonarushenij [The role of temporary detention centers for juvenile delinquents and special closed-type educational institutions in the system of crime prevention]. Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravoohranitel'naya praktika = Legal science and law enforcement practice, 2017, no. 4 (42), pp. 200–206.
7. Koryagina S. A. Aktual'nye problemy naznacheniya prinuditel'nyh mer vospitatel'nogo vozdejstviya [Actual problems of assignment of compulsory measures of educational influence]. Sibirskie ugolovno-processual'nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya = Siberian criminal-procedural and criminalistic readings, 2017, no. 1 (15), pp. 82–88.
8. Laminceva S. A. O nekotoryh voprosah, voznikayushchih pri rassmotrenii sudami del o pomeshchenii nesovershennoletnih v centry vremennogo soderzhaniya dlya nesovershennoletnih pravonarushitelej i v special'nye uchebno-vospitatel'nye uchrezhdeniya zakrytogo tipa [On some issues that arise when courts consider cases involving the placement of minors in temporary detention centers for juvenile delinquents and in special educational institutions of a closed type]. Rossijskoe pravosudie = Russian Justice, 2016, no. 11, pp. 28–46.
9. Nikolyuk V. V., Markovicheva E. V. Reshenie sudom voprosov, svyazannyh s napravleniem nesovershennoletnego v special'noe uchebno-vospitatel'noe uchrezhdenie zakrytogo tipa: ugolovno-processual'nye i organizacionno-pravovye problem [The court's decision on issues related to the placement of a minor in a special educational institution of a closed type: criminal procedure and organizational and legal problems]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Tomsk State University, 2018, no. 428, pp. 230–235. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/428/31
10. Smirnova I. G., Nikolyuk V. V., Markovicheva E. V., Kachalova O. V. Napravlenie nesovershennoletnih osuzhdennyh v special'nye uchebno-vospitatel'nye uchrezhdeniya zakrytogo tipa [Referral of convicted minors to special closed educational institutions]. Vserossijskij kriminologicheskiĭ zhurnal = All-Russian Journal of Criminology, 2019, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 837–845.
Review
For citations:
Sapronova K.A. With Regard to the Legal Uncertainty of the Procedure for the Placement of Juveniles in Special Closed Educational Institutions, at the Request of the Prosecutor. Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law. 2021;11(2):80-87. (In Russ.)
Views:
168
Email this article 