Guarantees of the Admissibility and Validity of the Rejection of Subjective Law in Criminal Proceedings: Problems of Legislative Regulation

Relevance. An element of the human rights system is the criminal procedure law, which allows to increase the degree of protection of the rights of persons in the field of criminal proceedings. The norms of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation specify a significant change in the attitude of the state towards the individual, however, many provisions of the law remain imperfect, which gives rise to cases of violation of individual rights in criminal proceedings, emphasizes the importance of studying the issues of legal regulation of guarantees of the admissibility and validity of the rejection of subjective law.
Purpose: the study of the problems of regulatory regulation of guarantees of the admissibility and validity of the rejection of subjective law, the development of proposals for further improvement of the criminal procedure law.
Objective: to study the totality of the norms of the criminal procedure law that enshrine the guarantees of the admissibility and validity of the waiver of the right, doctrinal sources, in the part related to the topic of the study.
Methodology. The basis of this research is a combination of the universal dialectical method of scientific cognition, general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, and private scientific methods of cognition, such as: formal-logical, formal-legal. The authors also used methods of studying social phenomena in their concrete manifestation in specific conditions of place and time: the study of documents, observation.
Results. A significant element in the hierarchical chain of the regulatory component, which forms the basis of guarantees of the admissibility and validity of the rejection of subjective law, is the criminal procedure law. Many of its provisions are aimed at ensuring the possibility of a person who has fallen into the sphere of criminal proceedings to express his will regarding the realization/non-realization of the benefits belonging to him. At the same time, the work of the legislator in this regard cannot be considered completed.
Conclusion. Improving the legal regulation of guarantees of the admissibility and validity of the rejection of subjective law will contribute to the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of citizens, correspond to the purpose of criminal proceedings.

1. Azarov V.V., Boyarskaya A.V. Ugolovno-protsessual'naya forma: ponyatie, svojstva, sistema [Criminal procedure form: concept, properties, system]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo = Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Right, 2020, no. 37, pp. 5–20.

2. Chebotareva I. N., Pashutina O. S., Revina I. V. K voprosu ob obespechenii svobody rasporyazheniya sub"ektivnymi pravami v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya i pravoprimeneniya [On the issue of ensuring the freedom of disposal of subjective rights in the Criminal process of Russia: problems of legal regulation and law enforcement]. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i pravo = Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law, 2022, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 90–106.

3. Zuev S. V., Sutyagin K. I. Ugolovnyj protsess [Criminal proceedings]. Chelyabinsk, Izdatel'skij tsentr YUUrGU, 2016. 563 p.

4. Ugolovnyj protsess [Criminal proceedings]; ed. by A. V. Grinenko. 2th ed. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2009. 496 p.

5. Strojkova A.S. Garantii prav obvinyaemogo na predvaritel'nom sledstvii. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk [Guarantees of the rights of the accused during the preliminary investigation. Cand. legal sci. diss.]. Rostov-on-Don, 2005. 141 p.

6. Ugolovnyj protsess [Criminal proceedings]; ed. by A. I. Bastrykin, A. A. Usachev. 5th ed. Moscow, Yurajt Publ., 2018. 468 p.

7. Ovchinnikov Yu. G. Sistema ugolovno-protsessual'nykh garantij [The system of criminal procedural guarantees]. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the South Ural State University, 2010, no. 25, pp. 54–58.

8. Strogovich M. S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. T. 1. Osnovnye polozheniya nauki sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa [The course of the Soviet criminal process. Vol. 1. The main provisions of the science of the Soviet criminal process]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1968. 468 p.

9. Pashutina O.S., Revina I.V. The problems of legislative control and practices of special knowledge usage in criminal case proceedings. 3rd International multidisciplinary scientific conference on social sciences & arts SGEM. Book 2. Political sciences, law, finance, economics & tourism. Albena, Bulgaria, 2016, vol. 2, pp. 863–868.

10. Pashutina O. S., Chebotareva I. N. [Ensuring the constitutional rights of citizens at the stage of pre-investigation verification of a crime report]. Edinstvo i differenciaciya dosudebnogo i sudebnogo proizvodstva v ugolovnom processe: novye konceptual'nye podhody v svete naslediya velikoj sudebnoj reformy. Sbornik nauchnykh statej Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem, posvyashhennoj 155-letiyu Sudebnykh Ustavov 1864 g., priurochennoj k 55-letiyu Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Unity and differentiation of pre-trial and judicial proceedings in criminal proceedings: new conceptual approaches in the light of the legacy of the great judicial reform. Collection of scientific articles of the AllRussian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation dedicated to the 155th anniversary of the Judicial Statutes of 1864, timed to the 55th anniversary of Southwest State University]. Kursk, Universitetskaya kniga Publ., 2019. pp. 270–273. (In Russ.)

11. Tat'yanina L. G., Abasheva F. A. Realizatsiya prava na zashhitu pri proizvodstve doznaniya v sokrashhennoj forme [Realization of the right to protection during the investigation in an abbreviated form]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ehkonomika i pravo = Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Series: Economics and Law, 2021, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 312–317.

12. Naumenko O. A. Zashhita prav poterpevshego pri sokrashhennoj forme doznaniya [Protection of the rights of the victim in the abbreviated form of inquiry]. Obshhestvo i pravo = Society and law, 2015, no. 4 (54), pp. 209–212.

13. Artamonova E. A. O soblyudenii prav poterpevshego pri prinyatii resheniya o proizvodstve doznaniya v sokrashhennoj forme [On the observance of the rights of the victim when making a decision on the conduct of an inquiry in an abbreviated form]. Yuridicheskie issledovaniya = Legal Research, 2013, no. 2, pp. 39–42.

14. Goryunov V. Novyj pravovoj institut (institut) [New Legal Institute (institute)]. Zakonnost' = Legality, 2010, no. 5, pp. 40–43.

15. Abshilava G. V. Soglasitel'nye protsedury v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossijskoj Federatsii. Avtoref. diss. dokt. yurid. nauk [Conciliation procedures in criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation. Dr. legal sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2012. 56 p.

16. Tisen O. N. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy instituta dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve v rossijskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Diss. dokt. yurid. nauk [Theoretical and practical problems of the Institute of pre-trial cooperation agreement in Russian criminal proceedings. Dr. legal sci. diss.]. Orenburg, 2017. 487 p.

17. Artamonova E. A. Kto dolzhen raz"yasnit' obvinyaemomu pravo na zaklyuchenie dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve? [Who should explain to the accused the right to conclude a pre-trial cooperation agreement?]. Rossijskij sledovatel' = Russian Investigator, 2011, no. 2, pp. 8–10.

18. Ovchinnikov Yu. G. Protsessual'nyj poryadok raz"yasneniya prav podozrevaemomu ili obvinyaemomu na zaklyuchenie dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve [Procedural procedure for clarifying the rights of a suspect or accused to conclude a pre-trial cooperation agreement]. Rossijskij sledovatel' = Russian Investigator, 2011, no. 15, pp. 29–32.

19. Tkachev I. V., Tissen O. N. Sravnitel'nyj analiz pravovoj reglamentatsii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve i osobogo poryadka sudebnogo razbiratel'stva v rossijskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Comparative analysis of the legal regulation of a pre-trial cooperation agreement and a special procedure for judicial proceedings in Russian criminal proceedings]. Ugolovnoe pravo = Criminal Law, 2011, no. 1, pp. 78–84.

20. Bagautdinov K. F. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve: aktual'nye problemy optimizatsii mekhanizma realizatsii i sovershenstvovaniya protsessual'nogo statusa ego uchastnikov. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk [Pre-trial cooperation agreement: actual problems of optimization of the mechanism of implementation and improvement of the procedural status of its participants. Cand. legal sci. diss.]. Nizhnij Novgorod, 2020. 224 p.

21. Abshilava G. V. Soglasitel'nye protsedury v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossijskoj Federatsii. Avtoref. diss. dokt. yurid. nauk [Conciliation procedures in criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation. Dr. legal sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2012. 56 p.

22. Baeva N. A. Uchastie advokata-zashhitnika pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve [Participation of a defense lawyer at the conclusion of a pre-trial cooperation agreement]. Sudebnaya vlast' i ugolovnyj protsess = Judicial power and criminal procedure, 2019, no. 2, pp. 62–68.

23. Pashutina O. S., Revina I. V. Otkaz podozrevaemogo ot prava na telefonnyj razgovor: problemnye aspekty zakonodatel'nogo regulirovaniya i pravoprimeneniya [Refusal of the suspect from the right to telephone conversation: problematic aspects of legislative regulation and law enforcement]. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i pravo = Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law, 2022, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 107–121.

24. Ukhanova N. V. K voprosu o raz"yasnenii sledovatelem nekotorykh prav poterpevshemu ot prestupleniya [On the question of the investigator explaining some rights to the victim of a crime]. Yuridicheskaya nauka = Legal Science, 2015, no. 4, pp. 140–147.