Ensuring Public Reliability of Data from the Consolidated State Register of Real Estate: Issues of Theory and Practice

The relevance of the article is determined by the fact that a state registration of rights in the Consolidated State Register of Real Estate is considered as the undoubted evidence of the existence of a registered right and is interpreted by the courts as a disputable presumption.
The purpose of the article is to study judicial practice in order to understand the significance of the public reliability of CSRRE data.
The objectives of the article are to analyze the current legislation of the state registration of real estate, determine the features of real estate, as well as identify legal mechanisms for disproving the reliability of CSRRE data.
Methodology. In the article authors use scientific methods, such as analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, description, formal-legal method.
Results. The public reliability of a data of the CSRRE are established procedures for the implementation of state cadastral registration and (or) state registration of rights, as well as procedures for eliminating registry errors in the CSRRE. The question of the reliability of a data of the CSRRE concerns both the characteristics of real estate objects and the rights to them. For ensuring the reliability of a data of the CSRRE are also noted organizational and technical means.
Conclusions. Based on the analysis of judicial practice, the author comes to conclusion that the courts demonstrate a clear understanding of the value of the public reliability of the CSRRE, which is legally provided by established procedures for the implementation of state cadastral registration and (or) state registration of rights, including the legal examination of the documents submitted for this purpose, as well as procedures for eliminating registry errors in the CSRRE, which can be implemented both by the decision of the state registrar of rights and on the initiative of interested persons in an administrative and (or) judicial procedure.

1. Apt L. F., Tokareva Yu. V. Principy formirovaniya i dejstviya gosudarstvennyh reestrov kak osobyh regulyatorov yuridicheskoj deyatel'nosti [Principles of formation and operation of state registers as special regulators of legal activity]. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika = Legal technique, 2020, no. 14, pp. 81–91.

2. Chesnokov A. A. Publichnost' imushchestvennogo reestra kak garantiya bezopasnosti dobrosovestnogo priobretatelya [Publicity of the property register as a guarantee of the security of a bona fide acquirer]. Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj akademii MVD Rossii = Legal Science and practice: Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2019, no. 3(47), pp. 171–175.

3. Zajcev V. V., Demieva A. G. O nekotoryh problemah nauchnoj novizny v civilisticheskih issledovaniyah (na primere dissertacionnyh rabot) [About some problems of scientific novelty in civil studies (on the example of dissertations)]. Metodologicheskie problemy civilisticheskih issledovanij = Methodological problems of civil studies, 2019, no. 1, pp. 64–86.

4. Motlohova E. A. Ob"edinenie svedenij EGRP i GKN v EGRN: predposylki, dejstviya, sostoyanie [Combining the data of the EGRP and GKN in the EGRN: prerequisites, actions, condition]. Pravovye voprosy nedvizhimosti = Legal issues of real estate, 2018, no. 2, pp. 27–30.

5. Zemlyakova G. L. Problemy cifrovizacii gosudarstvennyh uchetno-registracionnyh uslug v otnoshenii zemel'nyh uchastkov [Problems of digitalization of state accounting and registration services in relation to land plots]. Imushchestvennye otnosheniya v Rossijskoj Federacii = Property relations in the Russian Federation, 2022, no. 7 (250), pp. 93–100.

6. Ermakova A. V. Dejstvie principa publichnoj dostovernosti reestra prav na nedvizhimost' pri nepravomernom otchuzhdenii odnim iz byvshih suprugov nedvizhimoj veshchi, nahodivshejsya v ih sovmestnoj sobstvennosti [The effect of the principle of public reliability of the register of rights to real estate in case of unlawful alienation by one of the former spouses of an immovable thing that was in their joint ownership ]. Ex jure, 2022, pp. 26–41.

7. Sirazhetdinova O. Zemel'nye spory – samye vazhnye primery i ih analiz [Land disputes – the most important examples and their analysis]. Zhilishchnoe pravo = Housing Law, 2019, no. 12, pp. 27–34.

8. Beloglazov A. E., Anis'kina A. I., Beloglazova A. S. O nekotoryh osobennostyah isklyucheniya svedenij o pomeshcheniyah, prekrativshih svoe sushchestvovanie, iz Edinogo gos-udarstvennogo reestra nedvizhimosti [About some features of the exclusion of information about premises that have ceased to exist from the Unified State Register of Real Estate]. Pravovye voprosy nedvizhimosti = Legal issues of real estate, 2020, no. 1, pp. 5–7.

9. Ejriyan G. N. K voprosu o polnote i dostovernosti kadastrovyh svedenij o zemel'nyh uchastkah [On the issue of completeness and reliability of cadastral information on land plots]. Permskij yuridicheskij al'manah = Perm Legal Almanac, 2019, no. 1, pp. 354–360.

10. Chajkovskaya L. V. K voprosu o sovershenstvovanii mekhanizma informirovaniya i identifikacii uchastnikov dolevoj sobstvennosti pri provedenii sobraniya [On the issue of improving the mechanism for informing and identifying participants of shared ownership during the meeting]. Hozyajstvo i pravo = Economy and law, 2022, no. 11, pp. 111–120.

11. Bortnikova N. A. Vzaimosvyazannye iski, ispol'zuemye dlya zashchity prav na zemel'nye uchastki [Interrelated lawsuits used to protect rights to land plots]. Kommentarij sudebnoj praktiki [Commentary of judicial practice]; ed. by K. B. Yaroshenko. Moscow, IZiSP Publ., KONTRAKT Publ., 2019, is. 25, pp. 103–124.

12. Samojlov E. Yu. Publichnaya dostovernost' pri priobretenii nedvizhimogo imushchestva. Avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk [Public trustworthiness in the acquisition of real estate. Cand. legal sci. abstract diss.]. Moscow, 2010. 25 p.

13. Alekseev V. A. Publichnaya dostovernost' reestra prav na nedvizhimost': dejstvuyushchij princip ili delo budushchego? [Public reliability of the register of real estate rights: the current principle or a matter of the future?]. Zakon = Law, 2016, no. 11, pp. 125–132.

14. Dubova Ya. G. Snyatie s registracii "lozhnogo" ob"ekta nedvizhimosti [De-registration of a "false" real estate object]. Zhilishchno-kommunal'noe hozyajstvo: buhgalterskij uchet i nalogooblozhenie = Housing and communal services: accounting and taxation, 2019, no. 5, pp. 58–60.

15. Reznikov E. V. Samovol'naya postrojka: issledovanie zakonodatel'stva i praktiki Verhovnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii [Unauthorized construction: a study of the legislation and practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation]. Sud'ya = Judge, 2020, no. 7, pp. 47–53.

16. Chetverikova K. V. Priznaki nedvizhimogo imushchestva i ego kadastrovaya stoimost' [Signs of immovable property and its cadastral value]. Imushchestvennye otnosheniya v Rossijskoj Federacii = Property relations in the Russian Federation, 2019, no. 9, pp. 80–84.

17. Davydova O. V. Sistema kapel'nogo orosheniya: nalog na imushchestvo [Drip irrigation system: property tax]. Aktual'nye voprosy buhgalterskogo ucheta i nalogooblozheniya: uchet v sel'skom hozyajstve = Current issues of accounting and taxation: accounting in agriculture, 2022, no. 3, pp. 74–78.

18. Majboroda V. A. Deprivaciya v individualizacii zemel'nogo uchastka cherez ego granicy [Deprivation in the individualization of a land plot across its borders]. Yurist = Lawyer, 2023, no. 1, pp. 7–13.

19. Gusev A. O. O nekotoryh osobennostyah sudebnyh sporov ob ispravlenii reestrovyh oshibok [About some features of judicial disputes on correction of registry errors]. Arbitrazhnye spory = Arbitration disputes, 2020, no. 1, pp. 78–102.

20. Varushkin N. A. Nudum jus na rasporyazhenie ranee uchtennyh zemel'nyh uchastkov [Nudum jus on the disposal of previously registered land plots]. Pravo i ekonomika = Law and Economics, 2014, no. 2, pp. 60–62.