Issues of Qualifying Contingency of Crimes with Administrative Offenses in the Field of Traffic

Relevance. The article discusses the institution of conjugation of crimes with administrative offenses, analyzes its content and influence on the qualification of road traffic crimes. In connection with the introduction into Art. 264 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation of a qualifying sign in the form of conjugation of criminal violations of traffic rules with leaving the place of their commission, its prerequisites and expediency are considered, problematic issues that arise in connection with the competition of the norms governing responsibility for leaving the place of a road traffic crime by a person managing a transport vehicle are disclosed. means.
The purpose of the study is to reveal the features of the qualification of the contingency of road traffic crimes with administrative offenses, formulated in Art. 264 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation as a qualifying sign.
Objectives: to determine the feasibility of introducing the category of contingency of criminal violations of traffic rules with other offenses; determination of the features of its legal assessment when leaving the scene of a traffic crime, the specifics of the criminal-legal qualification of the driver's actions when leaving the injured at the scene of an accident in danger.
Methodology. In the process of research, methods of analysis and synthesis, induction, deduction, formal legal method, dialectical, hermeneutic methods were used.
Results. The legal assessment of the contingency of traffic violations that entailed criminal consequences with administrative offenses in the field of traffic in modern judicial practice has some peculiarities. They are connected with controversial issues in the current wording of the qualified compositions of Art. 264 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, when a careless crime becomes more dangerous when it is associated with an intentional administrative offense. The introduction of the conjugacy sign led to a change in the qualification rules, but did not finally resolve the competition with related crimes.
Conclusion. According to the results of the study, it was determined that the conjugation of road traffic crimes and offenses is designed to ensure the inevitability of responsibility for the facts of leaving the scene of a traffic accident by drivers, driving while intoxicated. Being a new category, it turned out to be in demand by the law enforcer, but the need for its uniform and fair application in qualification requires additional study and official interpretation.

1. Bavsun M. V., Veklenko V. V. Vliyanie kategorii "sopryazhennost'" na kvalifikaciyu prestuplenij [The influence of the category "conjugacy" on the qualification of crimes]. Ugolovnoe pravo = Criminal law, 2014, no. 5, pp. 16–18.

2. Kapinus O. S. Administrativnaya preyudiciya v ugolovnom prave: problemy teorii i praktiki [Administrative prejudice in criminal law: problems of theory and practice]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 6, pp. 78–86.

3. Baranchikova M. V. [Problems of qualification of criminal violations of traffic rules associated with leaving the place of their commission]. Ugolovnoe zakonodatel'stvo: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. Materialy ezhegodnoj Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii [Criminal legislation: yesterday, today, tomorrow. Materials of the annual All-Russian scientific and practical conference]. St. Petersburg, St.-Peterb. un-t MVD RF Publ., 2019, pp. 37–42. (In Russ.)

4. Korobeev A. I., Chuchaev A. I. Transportnye prestupleniya: ispravlenie oshibok ili dvizhenie po krugu? [Traffic crimes: correcting mistakes or moving in a circle?]. Ugolovnoe pravo = Criminal Law, 2019, no. 5, pp. 48–58.

5. Kruglikov L. L. O ponyatii prestuplenij s kvalificirovannymi sostavami [On the concept of crimes with qualified compositions]. Yuridicheskaya nauka = Legal Science, 2014, no. 2, pp. 120–126.

6. Motin A. V. Differenciaciya otvetstvennosti za prestupleniya protiv lichnosti posredstvom kvalificiruyushchih priznakov, otrazhayushchih elementy instituta mnozhestvennosti v strukture sostava prestupleniya [Differentiation of responsibility for crimes against the person by means of qualifying features reflecting elements of the institution of plurality in the structure of the corpus delicti]. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta kooperacii = Bulletin of the Russian University of Cooperation, 2020, no. 3 (41), pp. 137–142.

7. Chuchaev A. I. Ostavlenie mesta soversheniya dorozhno-transportnogo proisshestviya [Leaving the scene of a traffic accident]. Ugolovnoe pravo = Criminal law, 2020, no. 1, pp. 105–112.

8. Tyunin V. I., Ogar' T. A. Ostavlenie v opasnosti – cherez prizmu sudebnoj praktiki [Leaving in danger – through the prism of judicial practice]. Ugolovnoe pravo = Criminal Law, 2018, no. 5, pp. 73–81.

9. Zubcov A. A., Zubcova A. O. Ostavlenie mesta DTP kak kvalificiruyushchij priznak prestupleniya, predusmotrennogo st. 264 UK RF [Leaving the scene of an accident as a qualifying sign of a crime under Article 264 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation]. Ugolovnoe pravo = Criminal Law, 2020, no. 4, pp. 21–28.

10. Kol'cova E. Yu. [Leaving the crime scene as a qualifying sign of a crime under Article 264 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation]. Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii 25 let: istoriya, problemy, perspektivy. Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoprakticheskoj konferencii [Criminal Code of the Russian Federation 25 years: history, problems, prospects. Collection of materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference]. Ryazan', Ryazan St. Univ. Publ., 2022, pp. 64–66. (In Russ.)

11. Sorokin A. I. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za ostavlenie mesta DTP [Criminal liability for leaving the scene of an accident]. Nauka i praktika = Science and Practice, 2014, no. 1 (58), pp. 123–127.

12. Sostoyanie i tendencii bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya v Rossijskoj Federacii v 2011–2020 godah. Analiticheskij obzor [The state and trends of road safety in the Russian Federation in 2011-2020. Analytical review]. Moscow, FKU "NC BDD MVD Rossii", 2022. 368 p.

13. Zubenko E. V. Kriminalisticheskaya harakteristika dorozhno-transportnyh prestuplenij, sopryazhennyh s ostavleniem poterpevshih v opasnosti [Criminalistic characteristics of road traffic crimes involving the abandonment of victims in danger]. Akademicheskaya mysl' = Academic thought, 2018, no. 1 (2), pp. 19–23.

14. Voloshin A. I., Derevyankina S. A. Otvetstvennost' za ostavlenie mesta DTP: administrativnaya ili ugolovnaya [Responsibility for leaving the scene of an accident: administrative or criminal]. Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal'nogo universiteta imeni V. I. Vernadskogo. Yuridicheskie nauki = Scientific notes of the V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Legal sciences, 2019, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 110–115.

15. Gol'chevskij V. F. Pravovye i tekhnicheskie aspekty vyyavleniya voditelej, skryvshihsya s mesta proisshestvij [Legal and technical aspects of identifying drivers who fled from the scene]. Policejskaya deyatel'nost' = Policing, 2022, no. 2, pp. 8–19.

16. Zabolotnov A. A., Medvedev S. S. Ostavlenie mesta soversheniya dorozhnotransportnogo proisshestviya kak ugolovno nakazuemoe deyanie [Leaving the scene of a traffic accident as a criminally punishable act]. Colloquium-journal, 2019, no. 26(50), pt. 10, pp. 47–48.

17. Balyabin V. N. O sovershenstvovanii stat'i 264 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii [On improving Article 264 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation]. Rossijskij sud'ya = Russian judge, 2018, no. 11, pp. 32–34.

18. Kuz'minova E. Yu. Pravovye osobennosti privlecheniya k otvetstvennosti za ostavlenie mesta dorozhno-transportnogo prestupleniya [Legal features of bringing to responsibility for leaving the scene of a traffic crime]. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i kadry = Public service and personnel, 2021, no. 4, pp. 67–68.

19. Yamasheva E. V., Levonenkova T. A. Ostavlenie voditelem mesta dorozhnotransportnogo proisshestviya: podhody sudebnoj praktiki [Leaving the scene of a traffic accident by the driver: approaches of judicial practice]. Kommentarij sudebnoj praktiki [Commentary of judicial practice]; ed. by K. B. Yaroshenko. Moscow, IZiSP, KONRAKT Publ., 2019, pp. 215–224.

20. Korobeev A. I., Chuchaev A. I. Transportnye prestupleniya: novye shagi zakonodatelya i Konstitucionnogo Suda RF [Transport crimes: new steps of the legislator and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation]. Ugolovnoe pravo = Criminal Law, 2018, no. 4, pp. 73–82.