Historical change of scientific paradigms and the composition of the offence
https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2025-15-1-112-121
Abstract
Relevance. In the last decade, the focus of scientific research has shifted from specific issues to fundamental and interdisciplinary ones. For this reason, scholars in criminal law increasingly turn to fundamental categories, traditionally including crime and the elements of a crime. Modern discussions on the elements of a crime (its essence, structure, characteristics, etc.) necessitate a return to the origins of this category's formation and an analysis of the determinants that influenced changes in its content.
The purpose of this study is to justify the dependence of the content of the fundamental category of "elements of a crime" on the scientific paradigm.
Objectives: To analyze and compare the historical shifts in scientific paradigms and the modifications of the category of "elements of a crime" in criminal law science; to identify the specific features of understanding the elements of a crime in a given historical period.
Methodology. The study is based on the historical method, which made it possible to establish a connection between the prevailing scientific paradigm at a certain stage in the development of criminal law science and the understanding of the elements of a crime. Additionally, other general scientific methods were used, including analysis, synthesis, induction, and deduction.
Results. The study has proven that with the development of the theory of knowledge, specifically with changes in modes of thinking, the concept of the elements of a crime has also evolved.
Conclusion. The historical changes in types of thinking (the prevailing philosophical method of cognition) initially led to the transfer of the elements of a crime from the procedural to the substantive domain. Later, it facilitated the integration of subjective and objective aspects within it and ultimately transitioned from a set of subjective and objective characteristics of a real phenomenon to an informational model that describes a complexly structured crime.
About the Author
E. A. Soloveva
Perm State National Research University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena A. Soloveva, Candidate of Sciences (Juridical), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Deparment of Criminal Law and Prosecutor’s Supervision
15 Bukireva Str., Perm 614068
References
1. Galiakbarov R.R., Shul'ga A.V., Sokol A.V. The doctrine of the composition of crime in pre-revolutionary Russia. Obshchestvo i pravo = Society and Law. 2020;(1):20–26. (In Russ.)
2. Shiryaev A.YU. The doctrine of the composition of crime in the pragmatic concept of criminal law by P.A. Feuerbach. Rossiiskoe pravo: obrazovanie, praktika, nauka = Russian law: education, practice, science. 2022;(6):53–61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34076/2410_2709_2022_6_53.
3. Feierbakh P.I.A. Criminal law. Book 1. St. Petersburg: V meditsinskoi tip., 1810. 144 p. (In Russ.)
4. Kant I. Criticism of practical reason. Sobranie sochinenii = Collected works. Vol. 4, pt. 1. Moscow: Mysl'; 1965. 544 p. (In Russ.)
5. Gegel' G. Philosophy of law. Moscow: Mysl'; 1990. 524 p. (In Russ.)
6. Korobeev A.I., Lun Ch. Philosophical foundations of the doctrine of the four-element composition of crime. Sovremennoe pravo = Modern law. 2010;(2):25–28. (In Russ.)
7. Maslennikov D.V., Revnov B.A. The basic norm of G. Kelsen and its natural law justification. Yuridicheskaya mysl' = Legal thought. 2022;(1):69–80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47905/MATGIP.2022.125.1.006
8. Didikin A.B. Filosofiya prava Gansa Kel'zena. Moscow: Prospekt; 2021. 208 p. (In Russ.)
9. Turyshev A.A. The composition of the crime. Omsk: Omsk. akad. MVD Rossii; 2020. 104 p. (In Russ.)
10. Trainin A.N. The doctrine of the composition of the crime. Moscow: Yurid. izd-vo Minyusta SSSR; 1946. 185 p. (In Russ.)
11. Babii N.A The doctrine of the structure and composition of crime: monograph. Book I. The concept of structure and composition of crime. Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2019. 424 p. (In Russ.)
12. Kriger G.A. The composition of the crime and its significance. Sovetskaya yustitsiya = Soviet justice. 1982;(6):7–8. (In Russ.)
13. Savin'i F.K. fon. The system of modern Roman law. Vol. I. Moscow: Statut; 2011. 510 p. (In Russ.)
14. The doctrine of the corpus delicti in the criminal law of Russia and China. Comparative legal research. St. Petersburg: Yuridicheskii tsentr Press; 2009. 549 p. (In Russ.)
15. Shtoff V.A. Modeling and philosophy. Moscow: Nauka; 1966. 303 p. (In Russ.)
16. Polyakov S.E. Concepts and other constructions of consciousness. St. Petersburg: Piter; 2017. 624 p. (In Russ.)
17. Borisov V., Pashchenko A. On the issue of the essence of the criminal law characteristics of crimes. Ugolovnoe pravo = Criminal Law. 2005;(3):11–13. (In Russ.)
18. Miroshnichenko D.V. The phenomenology of crime. Uchenye trudy Rossiiskoi akademii advokatury i notariata = Scientific Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Law and Notary. 2021;(3):57–60. (In Russ.)
19. Durmanov N.D. The concept of crime. Moscow: Izd-vo akademii nauk SSSR; 1948. 315 p. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Soloveva E.A. Historical change of scientific paradigms and the composition of the offence. Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law. 2025;15(1):112-121. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2025-15-1-112-121
Views:
103
Email this article 