Deliberate environmental and legal risk: law enforcement and normative aspects
https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2024-14-5-20-31
Abstract
Relevance. Numerous environmental problems, overlapping with legal reality, transform the established legal order, introducing elements of uncertainty into it. In such circumstances, specific participants in legal relations do not always have a clear idea of how their model of behavior should be implemented in a legitimate way, which is why they quite consciously have to rely on risk. In its most general form, risk is a derivative of uncertainty. In the realities of environmental and legal uncertainty, situations are common where the subject of normative or law enforcement activities, relying on risk, does not have a clear forecast of the success of his legally significant decisions, but another behavior option that is not based on risk is either excluded altogether or difficult to implement. Such trends determine the need for a comprehensive theoretical understanding of the phenomenon of premeditation of subjects of lawmaking and law enforcement activities in the context of environmental and legal risk.
The purpose is to identify the key features of the premeditation factor in relation to the law enforcement and rule-making aspects of legal activity in the context of environmental and legal risk.
Objectives: to reveal the essence of premeditation as such, to consider the law enforcement and rule-making sides of premeditation of an ecological and legal nature in a risk-oriented model of legal relations, to identify the forms of manifestation of such premeditation.
Methodology. To solve the tasks set, methods of interpretation of normative and law enforcement acts, analysis, synthesis, concretization and abstraction were used.
The results of the study were data characterizing the features of intentional environmental and legal risks in law enforcement and rule-making environments.
Conclusion. The existence of deliberate environmental and legal risks is a consequence, firstly, of general environmental problems and, secondly, of defects in the field of legal regulation. Premeditation in the context of environmental and legal risk is expressed by the conscious will of the subject to achieve a certain useful result. Sometimes, in the format of normative or law enforcement work, such a risk is acceptable, but its use should be extremely careful.
About the Author
A. V. GusarovRussian Federation
Artem V. Gusarov - Post-Graduate Student of the Department of Theory and History of State and Law
87 Gorky Str., Vladimir 600000
References
1. Sarankina J.A. Global ecological problems of the present: the characteristic and the basic directions of overcoming. Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal'nogo universiteta imeni V. I. Vernadskogo. Yuridicheskie nauki = Scientific notes of V. I. Vernadsky crimean federal university. Juridical science. 2017;(3):188‒194. (In Russ.)
2. Adamyants S.T. Juridification of modern Russian society and the limits of legal regulation: general theoretical aspect of research. Pravo i upravlenie. XXI vek = Law and management. XXI century. 2022;(18):47‒54. (In Russ.)
3. Usmanova R.M. On the issue of the constitutional right to a favorable environment. Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika = Law and goverment: theory and practices. 2023;(10):173‒176. (In Russ.)
4. Averin A.V., Gusarov A.V. Limitation of rights to natural resources in the Russian Federation. Vestnik Vladimirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni Aleksandra Grigor'evicha i Nikolaya Grigor'evicha Stoletovyh. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki = Bulletin of Vladimir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs. Law Sciences. 2021;(3):8‒11. (In Russ.)
5. Agarkov M.M. Legal relationship (Chapter XII of the layout of a textbook on the theory of state and law, 1948). Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava = Civil law review. 2022;(3):145‒181. (In Russ.)
6. Kichigin N.V. Minimization and prevention of environmental and legal risks. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law. 2018;(8):144‒154. (In Russ.)
7. Mamchun V.V. Risk in legal activity: the essence and determination. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika = Legal technique. 2019;(13):243‒248. (In Russ.)
8. Agamirov K.V. The concept and meaning of legal forecasting. Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn = Legal policy and legal life. 2018;(3):13‒17. (In Russ.)
9. Zhavoronkova N.G., Agafonov V.B. Current trends in rulemaking in the field of land, urban planning and natural resource law. Aktual'nye problemy rossijskogo prava = Current problems of Russian law. 2019;(5):193‒204. (In Russ.)
10. Nanba S.B. Law: models and deviations. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law. 2014;(6):145‒149. (In Russ.)
11. Shindina A.V. On the problem of increasing the effectiveness of the rule-making process in modern Russia. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii = Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy. 2019;(3):90‒93. (In Russ.)
12. Shaburov A.S. Legal risk from the perspective of positive legal responsibility. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal = Russian law journal. 2019;(6):29‒33. (In Russ.)
13. Novikova E.V. On the practice of environmental law experiments. Ekologicheskoe pravo = Environmental law. 2021;(5):34‒40. (In Russ.)
14. Sivickiy V.A., Sorokin M.Y. Legal experiment and development of law. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki = Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2016;(4):15‒30. (In Russ.)
15. Lazarev V.V. Gaps in the law and ways to eliminate them. Moscow: Yurid. lit.; 1974. 184 p. (In Russ.)
16. Chagin I.B. The essential characteristic of the legal experiment. Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik = Siberian Legal Bulletin. 2021;(1):14‒18. (In Russ.)
17. Tihomirov Y.A. Forecasts and risks in the legal field. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law. 2014;(3):5‒16. (In Russ.)
18. Ficay D.A. Protection of environmental rights: some problems of theory and practice. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava = Journal of Russian law. 2018;(3):127‒135. (In Russ.)
19. Brazhnik I.S. Environmental courts: some issues of history and practice. Rossiysy sudia = Russian judge. 2021;(9):60‒64. (In Russ.)
20. Alekseev S.S. The structure of Soviet law. Moscow: Yurid. lit., 1975. 264 p. (In Russ.)
21. Gusarov A.V. Problems of making submissions in cases on administrative offenses in the environmental sphere. Administrativnoe pravo i process = Administrative Law and Process. 2023;(12):44‒47. (In Russ.)
22. Mamchun V.V. Law enforcement risk: problems of theory. Vladimir: Vladimir. yurid. in-t Minyusta Rossii; 2001. 135 p. (In Russ.)
23. Sadohina N.E. On the problem of codification of environmental legislation. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Politicheskie nauki i pravo = Bulletin of the Tambov University. Series: Political Science and Law. 2015;(1):42‒47. (In Russ.)
24. Vlasenko N.A. Uncertainty in law: the nature and forms of expression. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law. 2013;(2):32‒44. (In Russ.)
25. Tihomirov Y.A. Risk in law: nature and causes. Pravo i sovremennye gosudarstva = Law and modern States. 2016;(6):9‒19. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Gusarov A.V. Deliberate environmental and legal risk: law enforcement and normative aspects. Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law. 2024;14(5):20-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2024-14-5-20-31