Challenging (appealing) decisions, actions (inaction) of state bodies (their officials) and other persons (organizations) involved in the process of state registration of a legal entity. Part 2

Relevance. A legal entity is a popular legal tool for citizens of the Russian Federation to implement their economic and other interests, as evidenced by the statistical data of the Federal Tax Service of Russia in terms of state registration of legal entities. The scale of interaction between applicants and authorized bodies, as well as persons (organizations) involved in the state registration process, the current (far from optimal) state of legislation on state registration, which creates a favorable basis for the emergence of conflicts and disputes, suggests the need to develop effective forms and means of protecting the rights and legally protected interests of applicants, which, unfortunately, does not exist yet.

The purpose is to identify key problems and trends in the development of legislation in terms of appealing (challenging) decisions, actions (inaction) of state bodies (their officials) and other persons (organizations) involved in the process of state registration of a legal entity.

Objectives of the study: to analyze the development of legislation in terms of appealing (contesting) decisions, actions (inaction) of state bodies (their officials) and other persons (organizations) involved in the process of state registration of a legal entity; to identify the directions of such development, to understand the reasons for their formation; to identify the main problems and formulate ways to overcome them.

 Methodology. The article is written on the basis of traditional methods for legal research; the study is based on a systems analysis.

 Results. It has been established that the existing regulations were formed to a greater extent "spontaneously", in the absence of a special political and legal basis; inconsistency in the provisions of the main regulatory documents has been revealed; problems arising with pre-trial appeal of decisions (actions / inaction) of authorized bodies, actions of the MFC and its employees have been identified; problems with appealing / challenging the actions / inaction of notaries are indicated.

 Conclusion. The study shows the need for a systemic reform of the rules governing issues of appealing (challenging) decisions, actions (inaction) of state bodies (their officials) and other persons (organizations) involved in the state registration process; directions for appropriate changes are proposed.

1. Izmailova E.V. Notarial actions for the acceptance, recording, issuance, transfer of information and documents, as well as their submission to other bodies and organizations. Notarius = Notary. 2020;(2):8‒11. (In Russ.)

2. Sarbash S.V. Directions for improving the legislation on registration of legal entities. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava = Bulletin of civil law. 2006;6(1):26–34. (In Russ.)

3. Ilyushina M.N. Transactions aimed at the alienation of shares in the authorized capital of an LLC: new in legal regulation. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika = Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2009:(6):114‒118. (In Russ.)

4. Mikhailova E.V. (ed.) Notaries in the system of protecting the rights of individuals and the state in modern Russia. Moscow: Institute gosudarstva i prava RAN; 2023. 415 p. (In Russ.)

5. Rakitina L.N. Procedural status of a notary in civil proceedings. Notarius = Notary. 2021;(7):12‒15. (In Russ.)

6. Rakitina L.N. Determination of jurisdiction, venue and type of civil proceedings in cases on the actions of notaries. Notarius = Notary. 2019;(7):45‒48. (In Russ.)

7. Mihaylova E.V. On the nature and types of notarial activity and procedural forms of protecting the rights of its participant. Notarialnyj vestnik = Notarial Bulletin. 2022;(4):25‒36. (In Russ.)

8. Laptev V.A., Chucha S.Yu. Notarized evidence in judicial proceedings: theory and law enforcement practice. Vestnik grazhdanskogo processa = Bulletin of civil procedure. 2023;(1):79‒99. (In Russ.)

9. Zorina E.A. The stage of pre-trial appeal of decisions of the registration authority as an optional stage of state registration of legal entities. Administrativnoe pravo i process = Administrative law and process. 2015;(3):69–71. (In Russ.)

10. Zorina E.A. State registration of legal entities as a type of administrative-procedural proceedings. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O. E. Kutafina = Bulletin of the O.E. Kutafin University. 2015;(8):245–249. (In Russ.)

11. Zasemkova O.F. Special administrative districts a year and a half later: features, results and development prospects. Trudy Orenburgskogo instituta (filiala) Moskovskoj gosudarstvennoj yuridicheskoj akademii = Works of the Orenburg Institute (branch) of the Moscow State Law Academy. 2020;(1):15‒23. (In Russ.)

12. Finogentova O.E., Belaya O.V., Kuskov D.A. Current issues of legal regulation of the Oktyabrsky Island special administrative region in the Kaliningrad region. Pravo i ekonomika = Law and Economics. 2020;(3):25‒36. (In Russ.)

13. Morozova O.S., Berman A.I. New regulation of special administrative regions. Zakon = Law. 2022;(11):93–98. (In Russ.)

14. Tereshhenko L.K. State and municipal services: problems of law enforcement. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law. 2018;(10):101‒110. (In Russ.)

15. Belova O.A. Provision of state and municipal services by multifunctional centers in the Russian Federation: problems and ways of improvement. Vestnik ekonomicheskoj bezopasnosti = Bulletin of Economic Security. 2021;(3):328–332. (In Russ.)