Digital solutions for optimizing the sentencing of criminal penalties in times of war

Relevance. Unlawful acts under martial law carry an increased public danger, destabilizing national security, exacerbating resource scarcity and having an extremely negative impact on society. This requires the criminal justice system to respond as quickly and effectively as possible, including in terms of imposing fair and proportionate penalties. In light of the current foreign policy situation, the relevance of this study is undeniable.

Purpose. The purpose of the work is to identify the positive and negative aspects of the application of digital solutions to optimize the assignment of criminal penalties under martial law on the basis of a comprehensive analysis.

 Objectives: to identify specific factors and challenges affecting the process of sentencing in the context of military conflict, to study the best international experience in the use of digital technologies to improve the effectiveness of judicial determination of criminal sanctions, to analyze the prospects for the use of innovative tools in the imposition of criminal sanctions, taking into account the peculiarities of martial law, to identify the key advantages and limitations of the use of digital technologies in the judicial system to improve the objectivity, speed, and efficiency of the judicial process.

Methodology. The work is built on the basis of dialectical general scientific approach, which provided the integrity of the study and substantiation of cause-and-effect relationships. We used general scientific methods - analysis and synthesis, generalization, special legal method - comparative-legal method.

Results. Under martial law, the use of digital technologies can increase the objectivity, speed and transparency of sentencing. However, there are risks of errors and system failures, the need for costly investments, problems with information security and citizens' distrust of «soulless» machine solutions.

Conclusion. The study identifies both the potential benefits and risks of digital solutions for optimizing criminal sentencing under martial law. In order to improve the effectiveness and reliability of digital solutions, risks related to cybersecurity, personal data protection and resilience to disruptions under emergency conditions need to be carefully assessed. At the same time, it is important to continuously improve and adapt technologies, ensuring their flexibility to dynamically changing wartime realities.

1. Serebrennikova A.V. Digitalization of the execution of punishment: state and prospects. Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie = Man: Crime and Punishment. 2021;29(1):40-45. https://doi.org/10.33463/2687-1238.2021.29(1-4)

2. Molchanova T.V., Taranina E.I. Crime in the context of a special military operation. Kriminologicheskii zhurnal = Criminological Journal. 2023;3:139‒147. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2687-0185-2023-3-139-147

3. Chesney B., Citron D. Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. California Law Review. 2019;107:1753. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38RV0D15J

4. Chaikina A.V. The use of information technologies in the verification of court decisions in higher instances. In: Strel'tsova E. G. (ed.) Digital technologies in civil and administrative proceedings: practice, analytics, prospects. Moscow: Infotropik Media; 2022. P. 281‒296. (In Russ.)

5. Chernykh I.I. The influence of information technologies on evidence in civil proceedings. In: E. G. Strel'tsova (ed.) Digital technologies in civil and administrative litigation: practice, analytics, prospects. Moscow: Infotropik Media; 2022. P. 161‒214. (In Russ.)

6. Gribunov O.P. Application of “video search” technology in the detection, investigation and prevention of terrorist crimes. Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2018;3(86):173‒177. (In Russ.) EDN SAAGPF

7. Samsonova M.V. Electronic court: from idea to implementation. In: Strel'tsova E. G. (ed.) Digital technologies in civil and administrative proceedings: practice, analytics, prospects. Moscow: Infotropik Media; 2022. P. 231‒280. (In Russ.)

8. Russkevich E.A. Criminal punishment and digital technologies: a bifurcation point. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law. 2020;(7):77‒84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S102694520010658-4

9. Borisova L.V. On the main directions of the formation and development of e-justice in modern Russia. Pravo i tsifrovaya ekonomika = Law and Digital Economy. 2020;(2):32‒35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2618-8198.2020.08.2.032-035

10. Samsonova M.V., Chernykh I.I. Remote participation in court hearings on civil cases: first results and prospects. In: Strel'tsova E. G. (ed.) Digital technologies in civil and administrative proceedings: practice, analytics, prospects. Moscow: Infotropik Media; 2022. P. 129‒160. (In Russ.)

11. Alikperov Kh.D. Electronic system for determining the optimal punishment measure (problem statement). Kriminologiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra = Criminology: yesterday, today, tomorrow. 2018;4(51):13‒22. (In Russ.)

12. Bakhmet'ev P.V. On crimes committed using neural networks: domestic and foreign experience. In: Institutsional'nye osnovy ugolovnogo prava RF: k 70-letnemu yubileyu professora V.P. Konyakhina: sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii = Institutional foundations of criminal law of the Russian Federation: to the 70th anniversary of Professor V.P. Konyakhin: collection of materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Krasnodar: Kuban. gos. un-t; 2024. P. 678‒683. (In Russ.)

13. Kazakova T.A. The use of artificial intelligence technologies in the field of justice. In: Fomin E. V. (ed.) Economy and Law: Problems, Strategy, Monitoring. Cheboksary: Izd. dom “Sreda”; 2023. P. 143‒151. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31483/r-107662

14. Burtseva E.V. Digital Technologies in Jurisprudence. In: Fomin E.V. (ed.) Economy and Law: Problems, Strategy, Monitoring. Cheboksary: Izd. dom “Sreda”; 2023. P. 131‒142. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31483/r-107662

15. Kravchuk N.V. Artificial intelligence as a judge: prospects and concerns. Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Seriya 4: Gosudarstvo i pravo = Social Sciences and Humanities. Domestic and Foreign Literature. Series 4: State and Law. 2021;(1):115‒122. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31249/rgpravo/2021.01.12

16. Gritsenko E.V., Yalumer Y.A. The right to judicial protection and access to the court in the context of informatization and digitalization: the significance of the experience of common law countries for Russia. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie = Comparative Constitutional Review. 2020;3(136):97‒129. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21128/1812-7126-2020-3-97-129

17. Strel'tsova E.G., Chaikina A.V. Main directions of application of digital technologies. In: Strel'tsova E. G. (ed.) Digital technologies in civil and administrative proceedings: practice, analytics, prospects. Moscow: Infotropik Media; 2022. P. 1‒26. (In Russ.)

18. Strel'tsova E.G., Chaikina A.V. Conceptual foundations of the use of digital technologies in the field of justice and ADR. In: Strel'tsova E. G. (ed.) Digital technologies in civil and administrative proceedings: practice, analytics, prospects. Moscow: Infotropik Media; 2022. P. 215‒230. (In Russ.)

19. Krajnova N. A. "Electronic scales of justice": digitalization of processes or digitization of tasks? Kriminologiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra = Criminology: yesterday, today, tomorrow. 2019;(1):35‒38. (In Russ.)

20. Alikperov Kh.D. Electronic technology for determining the optimal measure of punishment (“Electronic scales of justice”). Rossiiskii sud'ia = The Russian Judge. 2020;(4):59‒64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3791-2020-4-59-64

21. Shestakov D.A. "Electronic scales of justice" in the light of the general criminality of the theoretical theory. Kriminologiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra = Criminology: yesterday, today, tomorrow. 2019;(1):13‒15. (In Russ.)

22. Golik Y.V. The search for a measure. Kriminologiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra = Criminology: yesterday, today, tomorrow. 2019;(1):23‒25. (In Russ.)

23. Sargsyan A.A. Prospects for the digitalization of the appointment and execution of criminal punishment. Penitentsiarnaya nauka = Penitentiary Science. 2022;16(2):146‒152. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46741/2686-9764.2022.58.2.003

24. Zaplatina T.S. Artificial intelligence in the issue of making judicial decisions, or AIjudge. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGIuA) = Courier of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL). 2019;(4):160‒168. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2019.56.4.160-168