Fathers without the right to paternity: family law mechanisms for balancing the interests of fathers and children

Relevance. The increasing divorce rates in Russia give rise to pressing legal and social challenges, particularly concerning the rights of children and fathers. Legal doctrine reveals a significant gap in both normative and ideological protection of fathers’ rights, resulting in discriminatory practices, especially in the resolution of disputes over child residence and visitation. This article urges the academic community to reconsider current presumptions and underscores the necessity of developing a legal framework aimed at establishing a robust institution of fatherhood, a matter that is particularly pertinent in the contemporary context.

The purpose of this article is to identify and analyze gaps in the regulation of legal aspects of fatherhood within national legislation, to develop fundamental principles for the institution of fatherhood, and to ensure the equality of parental rights in matters concerning the protection of children’s interests.

The objectives tasks encompass an analysis of law enforcement practices in the sphere of fatherhood, a study of existing legal norms and doctrines, and the formulation of proposals aimed at establishing a comprehensive legal framework for the institution of fatherhood in Russia.

The research methodology is based on a comprehensive analysis of legal norms, judicial practice, sociological and psychological data. Systemic, comparative-legal and formal-logical methods were used to identify gaps in the regulation of fathers' rights and to develop proposals for their elimination.

The results of the research demonstrate that the absence of a formal institution of fatherhood within Russian legislation results in discriminatory practices against fathers in judicial proceedings, particularly concerning the determination of a child’s residence and restrictions on parental access. Recommendations have been developed for the establishment of a fatherhood framework and legal reforms aimed at safeguarding the interests of both children and parents.

The conclusion of the study is the need to revise law enforcement practice and develop the legal institution of paternity, which will eliminate discrimination against men in family legal relations and create equality of rights for parents.

1. Bogdan V.V. Protection of traditional family values in the paradigm of transformation of family relations: balancing on the edge. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo = Bulletin of Tver State University. Series: Jurisprudence. 2024;(2):71‒79. (In Russ.)

2. Semenova I.Yu. Notary and protection of the rights of minors: gaps in legislation. Oeconomia et Jus. 2016;(4):70‒75. (In Russ.)

3. Emelina L.A Basic principles for the protection of children's rights in accordance with the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Pravo i obrazovanie = Law and education. 2023;(3):41‒50. (In Russ.)

4. Korolev S.V. On the causes of the crisis of the institution of fatherhood in Russia and its impact on value attitudes. Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v Rossii: sostoyanie, tendentsii, perspektivy = Civil Society in Russia: status, trends, prospects. 2015;(1):20‒23. (In Russ.)

5. Novoselov V.M. Actual problems of the institute of fatherhood in modern Russia. Nauchnyi aspekt = Scientific aspect. 2012;(1):72‒73. (In Russ.)

6. Shevchenko I.O. The Institute of Fatherhood: actual problems in the field of sociological research. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Iskusstvovedenie = Bulletin of the Russian State University. Series: Philosophy. Sociology. Art history. 2010;(3):278‒286. (In Russ.)

7. Probina S.S. The legal status of the father under Russian law. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Povolzhskii region. Obshchestvennye nauki = University Proceedings. Volga region. Social Sciences. 2017;(2):49‒54. (In Russ.)

8. Belyasov S.N. Constitutional and legal consolidation of paternity. Uchenye trudy Rossiiskoi akademii advokatury i notariata = Scientific works of the Russian Academy of Advocacy and Notary. 2016;(2):68‒71. (In Russ.)

9. Vasil'eva K.A. Gender inequality in family law. In: III Baikal'skii yuridicheskii forum: materialy mezhdunarodnykh nauchno-prakticheskikh konferentsii i konkursa molodykh uchenykh = III Baikal Legal Forum: materials of international scientific and practical conferences and a competition for young scientists. Irkutsk: Izd. dom BGU; 2023. P. 434‒441. (In Russ.)

10. Derevyanko P.A. The role of the Commissioner for Human Rights in protecting the rights of fathers. Biznes v zakone = Business in Law. 2012;(1):25‒28. (In Russ.)

11. Okulich A.I. Discrimination of fathers in family relations. Ural'skii forum konstitutsionalistov: materialy Devyatogo foruma = Ural forum of constitutionalists: materials of the Ninth Forum. Ekaterinburg: Ural'. gos. yurid. un-t im. V.F. Yakovleva; 2024. P. 28‒35. (In Russ.)

12. Tarusina N.N. Family values under the auspices of law: new in tradition and tradition in the new. Lex Russica. 2023;76(1):33‒52. (In Russ.)

13. Zaikov D.E. Features of the implementation of the principle of equality of rights and freedoms of men and women in labor relations. Grazhdanin i pravo = Citizen and Law. 2023;(4):51‒57. (In Russ.)

14. Torosyan R.A. Gender equality in the field of family relations. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo = Izvestiya of Saratov University. Series: Economics. Management. Law. 2018;18(3):349‒356. (In Russ.)

15. Shakhova E.S. On the issue of reforming the private and public principles of protection and protection of parenthood and childhood. Semeinoe i zhilishchnoe pravo = Family and Housing Law. 2016;(4):25‒29. (In Russ.)

16. Zykov S.V. Russian fatherhood: "defeat in rights". Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law. 2021;25(9):47‒60. (In Russ.)

17. Leonova A.D. The manifestation of discrimination against men in the legislation of the Russian Federation. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk = International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2021;(1-3):118‒123. (In Russ.)

18. Nikitashina N.A. Classification of presumptions in family law. Lex Russica. 2018;(3):34‒51. (In Russ.)

19. Timoshenko I.V., Khodeev F.P. Marital and family relations and disputes: advice from a lawyer. Moscow: MarT; 2004. 236 p. (In Russ.)

20. Emelina L.A., Yavorskii S.A. Actual problems of protection of housing rights of minors. In: Detstvo ‒ territoriya bezopasnosti: sbornik materialov konferentsii = Childhood ‒ the territory of security: a collection of conference materials. Moscow: Tsentr vynuzhdennykh pereselentsev «Saratovskii istochnik»; 2023. P. 142‒145. (In Russ.)