Preview

Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law

Advanced search

Committing a crime with public demonstration as a novel in criminal law

https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2025-15-2-182-191

Abstract

Relevance. The introduction into the criminal law as an aggravating circumstance and a qualifying feature for certain types of crimes related to the commission of a crime involving public demonstration, including in the media or information and telecommunications networks (including the Internet), is an important, albeit somewhat delayed step by the legislator in countering trash streams, annually increasingly gaining popularity on the web.

The purpose of the study is to establish criteria for the term "demonstration" that have criminal legal significance, as well as a criminal legal assessment of the actions of all those involved in a crime accompanied by a public demonstration in the media or information and telecommunications networks.

Objectives: to determine the legal content of the wrong concept of "trash stream"; to establish signs of demonstration; to give a criminal legal assessment of the actions of all participants in trash streams.

The methodology is based on general scientific methods such as analysis, synthesis, as well as formal logic and interpretation methods.

The results of the study show that increasing responsibility for the co-commission of a crime accompanied by a public demonstration, including in the media or information and telecommunication networks (including the Internet) is a timely decision by the legislator. The legal features of destructive content and the term "demonstration", which have a criminal legal meaning, are identified. An algorithm is proposed for the criminal assessment of the actions of all those involved in the commission of a crime, accompanied by a demonstration in the media or information and telecommunication networks.

Conclusions. The authors propose to understand trash streams as a demonstration of not only criminal, but also immoral or humiliating actions against another person. The demonstration assumes the possibility of transmitting data without the possibility of subsequent use, i.e. only online or performing actions in the presence of an indefinite circle of people. The person committing the violent act and the person making the video are co-executors. The idea of the need to introduce an independent criminal tort against those persons who view destructive content, expressing approval or paying for the conduct of this "spectacle" is expressed.

About the Authors

S. V. Sheveleva
Southwest State University
Russian Federation

Svetlana V. Sheveleva, Doctor of Sciences (Juridical), Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Law

50 Let Oktyabrya Str. 94, Kursk, 305040



O. G. Mihailova
Barnaul Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Russian Federation

Olga G. Mihailova, Candidate of Sciences (Juridical), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure

49 Chkalova Str., Barnaul, 656038



References

1. Pisarevskaya E.A., Dvorzhitskaya M.A., Malan'in A.A., Savel'eva D.E. Thrash streaming: problems of criminal law regulation. Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal = Eurasian Law Journal. 2024;2(189):312-316. (In Russ.)

2. Polunina E.N., Antonova A.V. Problems of legislative regulation of liability for "trash streaming" on the Internet. Zakon i pravo = Justice and Law. 2021;(3):90-91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/ 10.24412/2073-3313-2021-3-90-91.

3. Gracheva Yu.V., Malikov S.V. Trash stream: the social conditionality of criminalization. Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2021;16(6):202-210. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/19941471.2021.127.6.202-210.

4. Panosyan A.K. Criminological and criminal law analysis of acts committed within the subculture of trash stream. Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov = Union of Criminologists and Criminologists. 2021;(4):108-118. (In Russ.)

5. Astashkina P.D. Criminological characteristics of trash stream victims. ExLegis: pravovye issledovaniya = ExLegis: Legal Studies. 2022;(1):5-8. (In Russ.)

6. Grishaeva S.A., Pushkareva N.N. Trash streams as a manifestation of youth subculture. Tsifrovaya sotsiologiya = Digital Sociology. 2023;6(4):29-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2023-6-4-29-38.

7. Kapitonova E.A. Punks, thrash streams and other new forms of deviant acts committed in pursuit of popularity: problems of qualification. Ugolovnoe pravo = Criminal Law. 2024;(2):24-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52390/20715870_2024_2_24.

8. Abramyan S.K. Problematic aspects of stricter responsibility for trash streams in the Russian Federation. Gumanitarnye, sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki = Humanities, socioeconomic and Social Sciences. 2024;(2):61-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23672/SAE.2024.23.77.002.

9. Levandovskaya M.G. Conditions for the application of a uniform approach to the construction of a qualifying feature of a public demonstration of crimes against a person. Yuridicheskaya nauka = Legal Science. 2024;(10):263-267. (In Russ.)

10. Pestereva Yu.S., Timoshenko S.E. Criminal law, criminological, criminalistic aspects of public demonstration of crimes against the person in the information and telecommunication network "Internet". Sibirskoe yuridicheskoe obozrenie = Siberian Legal Review. 2024;21(4):596-608. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2024-21-4-596-608.

11. Tolkov D.V. Problems of criminal liability for crimes involving public demonstration, including in the mass media or information and telecommunication networks. In: Sovremennoe zakonodatel'stvo: perspektivy i puti razvitiya: materialy mezhregional'noi nauchno-prakticheskoi onlain-konferentsii = Modern legislation: prospects and ways of development: proceedings of the Interregional scientific and practical online conference. Rostov-on-Don: Rostov. gos. ekon. un-t (RINKh); 2024. P. 24-26. (In Russ.)

12. Shkele M.V., Kuznetsova N.I. Criminal liability for public demonstration of crimes against animals on the Internet. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the Saint Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2018;(1):97-100. (In Russ.)

13. Kara I. S. The preventive significance of the proposed tightening of legislation on public demonstration, including in the media or information and telecommunication networks (including the Internet) of scenes of violence, bullying of people. In: Pravo: istoriya, teoriya, praktika: sbornik statei i materialov mezhregional'noi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii = Law: history, theory, practice: collection of articles and materials of the interregional scientific and practical conference. Bryansk: Bryan. gos. un-t im. akad. I.G. Petrovskogo; 2024. P. 101-110. (In Russ.)

14. Greben'kov A.A. Internet broadcast of the commission of a crime in Russian criminal legislation and judicial practice. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo = Herald of Tver State University. Series: Law. 2022;(1):121-128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26456/vtpravo/2022.1.121.

15. Fil'chenko A.P. Protection of public morality from encroachments in the form of live broadcasts of illegal behavior (trash streams). Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii = Proceedings of Management Academy of the Ministry of Interior of Russia. 2021;(4):90-100. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2072-9391-2021-460-90-100.


Review

For citations:


Sheveleva S.V., Mihailova O.G. Committing a crime with public demonstration as a novel in criminal law. Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law. 2025;15(2):182-191. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2025-15-2-182-191

Views: 63


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2223-1501 (Print)