Preview

Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law

Advanced search

Conditional Early Release from Serving a Sentence ‒ a Subjective Right or a Legitimate Interest of the Convicted Person?

https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2022-12-3-83-93

Abstract

Relevance. The article raises a problem, the solution of which is crucial for understanding conditional early release from serving a sentence. In the modern doctrine of criminal and penal enforcement law, there has been a tendency to attribute parole to the legitimate interests of convicts and, as a result, to deny it the role of subjective law. However, such an approach contradicts not only the concepts of the essence of the categories of "subjective right" and "legitimate interest" that have developed in the general theory of law, but also the level and nature of the provision of parole guaranteed by the current Russian legislation.
The purpose of the study is to substantiate conditional early release from serving a sentence as a subjective right of convicts and to determine the boundaries of its implementation precisely as a subjective right.
Objectives: identification of essential, distinctive features of subjective right and legitimate interest; disclosure (by way of comparison) of the necessary defense as a universally recognized subjective right of any person; establishment in parole of properties identifying it as a subjective right or legitimate interest of convicts.
Methodology. When writing the work, both general scientific (analysis, synthesis, comparison) and private scientific, including special legal (formal legal, comparative legal) methods of cognition were used.
Results. Based on the conducted research, it was determined that conditional early release from serving a sentence reveals the features of subjective law.
Conclusion. According to the level of state recognition and legal security, conditional early release from serving a sentence is a subjective right of convicts. However, it is not absolute, individual claims of convicts, although they are associated with parole, are provided exclusively at the level of legitimate interests.

About the Author

Elena V. Kobzeva
Saratov State Law Academy
Russian Federation

Candidate of Sci. (Juridical), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Criminal and Penal Law

1 Volskaya str., Saratov 410056



References

1. Tagantsev N. S. Russkoye ugolovnoye pravo. [Russian criminal law]. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2020, pt. 2. 446 p.

2. Poznyshev S. V. Osnovy penitentsiarnoy nauki [Fundamentals of penitentiary science]. Moscow, Yurid. izd-vo Narkomyusta Publ., 1923. 342 p.

3. Tkachevsky Yu. M. Osvobozhdeniye ot otbyvaniya nakazaniya [Release from serving a sentence]. Moscow, Yurid. lit., 1970. 240 p.

4. Zeldov S. I. Osvobozhdeniye ot nakazaniya i ego otbyvaniya [Release from punishment and its serving]. Moscow, Yurid. lit, 1982. 137 p.

5. Mikhlin A. S. Problemy dosrochnogo osvobozhdeniya ot otbyvaniya nakazaniya [Problems of early release from serving a sentence]. Moscow, Izd-vo VNII MVD SSSR, 1982. 152 p.

6. Babayan S. L. [Improvement of incentive institutions of penal enforcement law - an important task of reforming the penal enforcement system of Russia]. Ugolovno-ispolnitelnaya politika, zakonodatelstvo i pravo: Sovremennoye sostoyaniye i perspektivy razvitiya. Sbornik materialov kruglogo stola, posvyashchennyi pamyati d-ra yurid. nauk, prof., zasluzh. yurista RF O. V. Filimonova [Penal enforcement policy, legislation and law: The current state and prospects of development. Collection of materials of the round table, dedicated. in memory of Dr. legal. sci., Prof., honored. Lawyer of the Russian Federation O. V. Filimonov]; ed. by V. I. Seliverstov, V. A. Utkin. Moscow, Jurisprudence Publ., 2014, pp. 43‒51. (In Russ.)

7. Geta M. R. Ugolovnoye pravo: predely, ob"ekty i sredstva vozdeystviya v borbe s prestupnostyu v sovremennoy Rossii [Criminal law: limits, objects and means of influence in the fight against crime in modern Russia]. Moscow, Yur. Norma Publ., 2017. 336 p.

8. Konkina O. V. Instituty uslovno-dosrochnogo osvobozhdeniya ot otbyvaniya nakazaniya i zameny neotbytoy chasti nakazaniya boleye myagkim vidom nakazaniya po deystvuyushchemu ugolovnomu zakonodatelstvu Rossii [Institutions of conditional early release from serving a sentence and replacement of the unserved part of the sentence with a milder type of punishment under the current criminal legislation of Russia]. Ryazan, Acad. of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia Publ., 2014. 192 p.

9. Seliverstov V. I. Ugolovno-pravovye i ugolovno-ispolnitel'nye problemy uslovnodosrochnogo osvobozhdeniya [Criminal law and penal enforcement issues of conditional early release]. Ugolovnoe pravo = Criminal Law, 2015, no. 3, pp. 126‒130.

10. Skiba A. P., Myakhanova A. N., Erkhitueva T. I. Uslovnoe osuzhdenie i uslovnodosrochnoe osvobozhdenie: osnovaniya primeneniya [Conditional conviction and parole: grounds for application]. Ulan-Ude, Buryat St. Univ. Publ., 2020. 124 p.

11. Stepanov V. V. Uslovno-dosrochnoe osvobozhdenie ot otbyvaniya nakazaniya: teoreticheskie i pravoprimenitelnye problemy [Conditional early release from serving a sentence: theoretical and law enforcement problems]; ed. by N. A. Lopashenko. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2010. 178 p.

12. Sheriev A. M. Subyektivnye prava, svobody i zakonnye interesy kak obyekty pravovoy okhrany i zashchity: problemy teorii i praktiki. Avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk [Subjective rights, freedoms and legitimate interests as objects of legal protection and protection: problems of theory and practice. Cand. legal. sci. abstract diss.]. Krasnodar, 2008. 25 p.

13. Matuzov N. I. Aktualnye problemy teorii prava [Actual problems of the theory of law]. Saratov, Saratov St. Law Acad. Publ., 2004. 510 p.

14. Malko A. V., Subochev V. V. Zakonnye interesy kak pravovaya kategoriya [Legitimate interests as a legal category]. St. Petersburg, Izd-vo R. Aslanova "Jurid. Centr Press", 2004. 357 p.

15. Burmistrova S. A. Zakonnye interesy, sub"yektivnye prava i svobody kak pravovye vozmozhnosti: sootnosheniye struktury, soderzhaniya i realizatsii [Legitimate interests, subjective rights and freedoms as legal possibilities: correlation of structure, content and implementation]. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2019, no. 3, pp. 180‒187.

16. Kuliyev R. I. Uslovno-dosrochnoe osvobozhdenie ot lisheniya svobody i problemy povysheniya ego effektivnosti. Avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk [Conditional early release from imprisonment and problems of increasing its effectiveness. Cand. legal sci. abstract diss.]. Leningrad, 1984. 24 p.

17. Knyazkov A. S. Uslovno-dosrochnoe osvobozhdenie: problemy i tendentsii [Parole: problems and trends]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo = Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Right, 2015, no. 2, pp. 63‒69.

18. Makarova O. V. Osvobozhdenie ot nakazaniya [Release from punishment]. Gumanizatsiya sovremennogo ugolovnogo zakonodatelstva [Humanization of modern criminal legislation]; ed. by V. P. Kashepov. Moscow, IZiSP pri Pravitel'stve RF Publ., INFRA-M Publ., 2018, pp. 154‒182.

19. Minakov G. L., Abashina L. A. Uslovno-dosrochnoe osvobozhdenie ot nakazaniya: pravo ili zakonnyy interes? [Conditional early release from punishment: right or legitimate interest?]. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i pravo = Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law, 2016, no. 3, pp. 89‒94.

20. Ulitsky S. Ya. Uslovno-dosrochnoe osvobozhdenie osuzhdennykh k lisheniyu svobody i zamena im nakazaniya bolee myagkim. Avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk [Conditional early release of convicted persons to imprisonment and their replacement of punishment with a milder one. Cand. legal sci. abstract diss.]. Alma-Ata, 1964. 20 p.

21. Inogamova-Hegai L. V., Kazaryan E. A. Osnovaniya i predposylki primeneniya uslovno-dosrochnogo osvobozhdeniya [Grounds and prerequisites for the application of conditional early release]. Ugolovnoe pravo = Criminal Law, 2003, no. 4, pp. 28‒29.

22. Rashidov Sh. M. Ugolovno-pravovye problemy primeneniya uslovno-dosrochnogo osvobozhdeniya ot otbyvaniya nakazaniya (po materialam Respubliki Dagestan). Avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk [Criminal-legal problems of the application of conditional early release from serving a sentence (based on the materials of the Republic of Dagestan). Cand. legal sci. abstract diss.]. Makhachkala, 2005. 25 p.

23. Tkachevsky Yu. M. Osvobozhdenie ot nakazaniya [Release from punishment]. Kurs ugolovnogo prava. Obshchaya chast. T. 2. Ucheniye o nakazanii [Course of criminal law. General part. Vol. 2. The doctrine of punishment]; ed. by N. F. Kuznetsova and I. M. Tyazhkova. Moscow, Zertsalo, 1999, pp. 216‒243.


Review

For citations:


Kobzeva E.V. Conditional Early Release from Serving a Sentence ‒ a Subjective Right or a Legitimate Interest of the Convicted Person? Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law. 2022;12(3):83-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2022-12-3-83-93

Views: 333


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2223-1501 (Print)