Correlation Between the Concepts of "Refusal of Subjective Law" and "Restriction of Law" in Russian Criminal Procedure

Relevance. In domestic legal science in general, and in the theory of criminal procedure in particular, there is no unity of views on the relationship between the concepts of "restriction of rights" and "waiver of rights". Meanwhile, the study of the issue of conjugation of these concepts is important, because in the conditions of the initially unequal position of the individual and the state represented by officials and bodies, the possibility of using coercion by them, which is especially clearly manifested in the field of criminal proceedings, the confusion of these concepts and their unjustified substitution are fraught with illegal infringement of the rights and freedoms of the individual, possible abuses by officials conducting criminal proceedings. These circumstances necessitate a scientific understanding of the problem of the relationship between the restriction of the rights and freedoms of the individual and the rejection of subjective rights.
Purpose - to study the relationship between the concepts of "restriction of rights" and "waiver of rights" in the domestic doctrine of criminal procedure law.
Objective. To achieve the stated goal, the authors study the concept of limitation of law and refusal of subjective law in criminal proceedings, which are available in the domestic doctrine of law, based on the signs of these two legal phenomena, and identify their relationship.
Methodology. The research is based on the universal dialectical method of scientific knowledge and general scientific methods based on it (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction), as well as specific scientific methods of cognition (formal-logical, formal-legal, etc.).
Results. Authors formulated the concepts of "restriction of rights in criminal procedure " and "waiver of rights in criminal procedure".
Conclusion. Restriction of rights and waiver of rights are independent legal phenomena that have different legal nature and purpose.

1. Kibal'nik A. G., Solomonenko I. G. Ob ogranichenii konstitucionnogo prava na tajnu lichnoj (chastnoj) zhizni [On the restriction of the constitutional right to privacy of personal (private) life]. Obshchestvo i pravo = Society and Law, 2008, no. 2, pp. 49–52.

2. Bushkov D. V. Tajna lichnoj korrespondencii v ugolovnom prave. Avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk [The secrecy of personal correspondence in criminal law. Cand. legal sci. abstract diss.]. Stavropol', 2003. 26 p.

3. Klochkov V. N. Narushenie neprikosnovennosti chastnoj zhizni v ugolovnom prave. Avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk [Violation of privacy in criminal law. Cand. legal sci. abstract diss.]. Moscow, 2004. 28 p.

4. Vechkanova N. V. Konstitucionnoe regulirovanie i sudebnaya zashchita lichnyh prav i svobod v stranah SNG. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk [Constitutional regulation and judicial protection of personal rights and freedoms in the CIS countries. Cand. legal sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2014. 30 p.

5. Chebotareva I. N., Pashutina O. S., Revina I. V. Otkaz ot sub"ektivnogo prava kak fenomen v ugolovnom processe Rossii [Rejection of subjective law as a phenomenon in the criminal process of Russia]. Kursk, Universitetskaya kniga Publ., 2020. 250 p.

6. Prihod'ko T. V. Zashchita prav v Konstitucionnom Sude Rossijskoj Federacii i Evropejskom sude po pravam cheloveka [Protection of rights in the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the European Court of Human Rights]. Moscow, Yurajt Publ., 2021. 177 p.

7. Kudryavcev V. N. Pravo i povedenie [Law and conduct]. Moscow, Yurid. lit. Publ., 1978. 191 p.

8. Andreev Yu. N. Ogranicheniya v grazhdanskom prave Rossii [Restrictions in Russian Civil Law]. St. Petersburg, Yuridicheskij centr Press Publ., 2011. 398 p.

9. Matuzov N. I. O kategoriyah "sub"ektivnoe pravo" i "yuridicheskaya obyazannost'" v svete sovremennogo pravovogo razvitiya [On the categories of "subjective right" and "legal obligation" in the light of modern legal development]. Lichnost' i vlast'. Sbornik nauchnyh rabot [Personality and power. Collection of scientific works]. Rostov-on-Don, Rostovskaya Vysshaya shkolya MVD RF Publ., 1995, pp. 25–45.

10. Ozhegov S. I. Slovar' russkogo yazyka [Dictionary of the Russian language]. 16th ed. Moscow, Rus. yaz. Publ., 1984. 797 p.

11. Volkova N. S. Obshchestvennaya bezopasnost' i zakonodatel'stvo o pravah cheloveka [Public Safety and human rights legislation]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2005, no. 2, pp. 93–100.

12. Trubnikova T. V. Zloupotreblenie pravom v ugolovnom processe: kriterii i predely vmeshatel'stva so storony gosudarstva [Abuse of law in criminal proceedings: criteria and limits of State intervention]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo = Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Right, 2015, no. 3 (17), pp. 65–78.

13. Yagofarova I. D. Osnovnye harakteristiki ogranicheniya prav i svobod cheloveka: teoretikopravovoj aspekt [The main characteristics of the restriction of human rights and freedoms: theoretical and legal aspect]. Akademicheskij yuridicheskij zhurnal = Academic Law Journal, 2002, no. 4, pp. 4–10.

14. Gojman V. I. Principy, predely, osnovaniya ogranicheniya prav i svobod cheloveka po rossijskomu zakonodatel'stvu i mezhdunarodnomu pravu [Principles, limits, grounds for restricting human rights and freedoms under Russian legislation and international law]. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 1998, no. 7, pp. 20–43.

15. Ebzeev B. S. Chelovek, narod, gosudarstvo v konstitucionnom stroe Rossijskoj Federacii [A Person, a People, a State in the constitutional system of the Russian Federation]. Moscow, Yurid. lit. Publ., 2005. 574 p.

16. Kostyleva E. D. Lichnye prava cheloveka v Rossijskoj Federacii i standarty Soveta Evropy: konstitucionno-pravovye problemy regulirovaniya i zashchity. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk [Personal human rights in the Russian Federation and the standards of the Council of Europe: constitutional and legal problems of regulation and protection. Cand. legal sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2008. 25 p.

17. Pirbudagova D. Sh. K voprosu o konstitucionnyh predelah ogranicheniya osnovnyh prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v Rossijskoj Federacii [On the question of the constitutional limits of the restriction of fundamental human and civil rights and freedoms in the Russian Federation]. Yuridicheskij mir = Legal World, 2009, no. 12, pp. 4–19.

18. Tolkovyj slovar' D. N. Ushakova [Explanatory dictionary of D. N. Ushakov]. Available at: https://ushakovdictionary.ru/word.php?wordid=5669. (accessed 11.10.2021)

19. Kazimirskaya Yu. V. Konstitucionno-pravovye osnovy ogranicheniya lichnyh (grazhdanskih) prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v Rossii i zarubezhnyh stranah. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk [Constitutional and legal bases of restriction of personal (civil) rights and freedoms of man and citizen in Russia and foreign countries. Cand. legal sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2016. 228 p.

20. Shaburov A. S. "Ogranichenie prava", "ogranicheniya v prave", "pravovye ogranicheniya": sootnoshenie ponyatij ["Limitation of rights", "restrictions in law", "legal restrictions": correlation of concepts]. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika = Legal technique, 2018, no. 12, pp. 365–371.

21. Lebedev V. A. Konstitucionnye osnovy ogranichenij prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina [Constitutional bases of restrictions on human and civil rights and freedoms]. Lex Russica, 2017, no. 1 (122), pp. 130–139.

22. Tikk O. K. O ponyatii "ogranichenie grazhdanskih prav" [On the concept of "restriction of civil rights"]. Trudy instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossijskoj akademii nauk = Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2001, no. 2, pp. 75–89.

23. Mal'ko A. V. Stimuly i ogranicheniya v prave [Incentives and restrictions in law]. Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Pravovedenie = Proceedings of Higher educational Institutions. Jurisprudence, 1998, no. 3(222), pp. 134–147.

24. Galdin M. V. Ogranichenie konstitucionnogo prava na neprikosnovennost' zhilishcha pri proizvodstve sledstvennyh dejstvij [Restriction of the constitutional right to inviolability of the home during investigative actions]. Sibirskie ugolovno-processual'nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya = Siberian Criminal Procedural and Criminalistic Readings, 2019, no. 1(23), pp. 31–36.