Formation and Development of the Institute of Easements in Russia and Vietnam: Problems of Reception and Interpretation
https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2022-12-3-36-50
Abstract
Relevance. Scientific consideration and study of the easement is impossible without referring to its genesis, understanding the reasons for which allows us to draw correct and reasonable conclusions for its modernization in modern civil law of Russia and Vietnam.
The purpose of the study is to reveal the prerequisites for the emergence of easements in Roman law, the concept of easement, its legal nature, types; to consider the problem of reception by Russian and Vietnamese legislation of provisions on Roman easement, as well as to develop de lege ferenda ideas about the modern approach to the regulation of easement relations in the legislation of both states and identify trends in their development.
Objectives. Within the framework of the research, the following tasks are set: a comprehensive study of the genesis of the institute of easement in the law of Russia and Vietnam; comparison and identification of approaches and trends in the development of this institute; the proposal of various approaches for the modernization of the easement.
Methodology. The methodological basis of the research consists of: the formal legal method, the historical method, the philosophical method, the method of analysis, synthesis and the comparative legal method.
Results. A comparative legal analysis of the formation and development of the institute of easement in the law of Russia and Vietnam is carried out.
Conclusions. The formation and development of the institution of servitude in Russia and Vietnam are based on Roman ideas, as well as on a number of national factors. Analyzing the legal regulation of servitude relations in the modern legislation of Vietnam and Russia, we can conclude that it is far from perfect.
About the Author
Thi Hoan Nguyen
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Post-Graduate Student of the Department of Civil Law
9 Sadovaya-Kudrunskaya Str., Moscow 125993
References
1. Vasilevskaya L. Yu. Uchenie o veshchnykh sdelkakh po germanskomu pravu [The doctrine of property transactions under German law]. Moscow, Status Publ., 2004. 538 p.
2. Kopylov A. V. Veshchnye prava na zemlyu v rimskom, russkom dorevolyutsionnom i sovremennom rossiiskom grazhdanskom prave [Real rights to land in Roman, Russian prerevolutionary and modern Russian civil law]. Moscow, Status Publ., 2000. 255 p.
3. Sukhanov Ye. A. Veshchnoye pravo: nauchno-poznavatel'nyy ocherk [Real right: a scientific and educational essay]. Moscow, Status Publ., 2017. 560 p.
4. Dernburg G. Pandekty. T. 1, ch. 2. Veshchnoe pravo [Pandects. Vol. 1. Pt. 2. Real right]; ed. by A. F. Meiendorfa. 6th ed. St. Petersburg, 1905. 364 p.
5. Pokrovskii I. A. Istoriya rimskogo prava [History of Roman Law]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2004. 540 c.
6. Baron Yu. Sistema rimskogo grazhdanskogo prava. Vyp. P. Kn. 3 [The system of Roman civil law. Is. P. Book 3]. St. Petersburg, Yurid. centr. Press, 2005. 1102 p.
7. Vu Van Mau. Ancient Vietnamese law for reference and judicial history. The first book. Sai Gon, 1974. 269 p. (In Vietnam)
8. Ngo Huy Cuong. The Impact of French Laws on Private Law in Vietnam. Legislative Studies Journal, 2016, no. 12, pp. 95‒115. (In Vietnam)
9. Nguyen Ngoc Nhuan, Nguyen Ta Nhi. The National Criminal Code of the Le dynasty. Ha Noi, Justice, 2013. 358 p. (In Vietnam)
10. Nguyen Thi Dung, Le Thi Son. The National Criminal Code of the Le dynasty: history of formation, content and value. Hanoi, Social Sciences, 2004. 463 p. (In Vietnam)
11. Nguyen Si Giac, Vu Van Mau. Hong-duc Thien Chinh Thu (Book of Good Government of the Hong Duc Period). Saigon, Nam-ha An-quan, 1959. (In Vietnam)
12. Lan Quoc Nguyen. Traditional vietnamese law-the le code and modern united states law: a comparative analysis. Hastings international and Comparative Law Review, 1989, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 141‒177.
13. Ta Van Tai. Vietnam’s Code of the Le Dynasty (1428‒1788). The American Journal of Comparative Law, 1982, vol. 30, is. 3, pp. 523‒554.
14. Emel'kina I. A. Sistema ogranichennykh veshchnykh prav na zemel'nyy uchastok [The system of limited real rights to a land plot]. Moscow, Infotropik Media, 2013. 416 p.
15. Mai Van Thang. Sovremennaya pravovaya sistema V'etnama i problemy ee modernizatsii. Avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk [The modern legal system of Vietnam and the problems of its modernization. Cand. legal sci. abstract diss.]. Stavropol, 2010. 12 p.
16. Le Hong Hanh. The legal nature of the land use right in Vietnamese law. Democracy and Law Journal = Ministry of Justice, 2017, no. 8, pp. 22–25. (In Vietnam)
17. Nguyen Minh Oanh. Real rights in modern Vietnamese civil law. Hanoi, People's Public Security, 2018. 382 p. (In Russ.)
18. Duong Dang Hue. The concept of rights in rems should be used in the Civil Code. Legislative Studies Journal, 2015, no. 13. (In Vietnam)
19. Pham Cong Lac. Right to use adjacent real estate. Hanoi, Publisher. Justice, 2006. 315 p. (In Vietnam)
20. Do Van Dai. Security rights in rem: foreign experience for Vietnam. Vietnamese legal science journal, 2015, no. 01 (86), pp. 57‒65. (In Vietnam)
21. Nguyen Ngoc Dien. Issues that need to be resolved when developing provisions on property rights and other property rights in the draft Civil Code. Democracy and Law Journal, 2015, pp. 61‒70. (In Vietnam)
22. Kalinichev A.V. Zemel'nyi servitut v rossiiskom zakonodatel'stve. Avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk [Land easement in Russian legislation. Cand. legal sci. abstract diss.]. Moscow, 2007.
23. Sinayskii V. I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo. Vyp. I. Obshchaya chast'. Veshchnoe pravo. Avtorskoye pravo [Russian civil law. Issue I. General part. Property law. Copyright]. Kiev, Typo-lithograph "Progress", 1917. 330 p.
24. Pobedonostsev K. P. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava. Chast' 1. Votchinnyye prava [Civil law course. Part 1. Patrimonial rights]. St. Petersburg, Sinodal'naya tip., 1896. 745 p.
25. Kurdinovskiy V. I. K ucheniyu o legal'nykh ogranicheniyakh prava sobstvennosti na nedvizhimost' v Rossii [On the doctrine of legal restrictions on property rights to real estate in Russia]. Odessa, Ekonomicheskaya tip., 1899. 387 p.
26. Nevolin K. A. Istoriya rossiyskikh grazhdanskikh zakonov. Ch. 2 [History of Russian civil laws. Part 2]. Moscow, Status Publ., 2006. 416 p.
27. Yel'yashevich V.B. Pravo uchastiya chastnogo i ego zashchita [The right of private participation and its protection]. Vestnik Grazhdanskogo prava = Vestnik of Civil Law. St. Petersburg, 1914, no. 2, pp. 18–35.
28. Shershenevich G. F. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo prava [Textbook of Russian Civil Law]. Moscow, Izd. Br. Bashmakovykh, 1914, vol. I. 483 p.
29. Gulyayev A. M. Russkoye grazhdanskoye pravo [Russian civil law]. 4 th ed., rev. and additional. St. Petersburg, Typ. M. M. Stasyulevicha, 1913. 650 p.
30. Grazhdanskoe Ulozhenie. Proekt Vysochaishe uchrezhdennoi Redaktsionnoi Komissii po sostavleniyu Grazhdanskogo Ulozheniya. Kniga tret'ya. Votchinnoe pravo [Civil Code. The draft of the Most Highly established Editorial Commission for the drafting of the Civil Code. Book Three. Patrimonial law]; comp. A. L. Saatchian, I. M. Tyutryumov. St. Petersburg, Izd. knizhnogo magazina «Zakonovedenie», 1910, vol. 1, pp. 857‒881.
31. Nguyen T. Kh. Vidy servitutov i osobennosti ikh osushchestvleniya v rossiyskom i v'etnamskom prave [Types of easements and features of their implementation in Russian and Vietnamese law]. Pravo i politika = Law and Politics, 2021, no. 11, pp. 43‒60. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0706.2021.11.37024
Review
For citations:
Nguyen T.H. Formation and Development of the Institute of Easements in Russia and Vietnam: Problems of Reception and Interpretation. Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law. 2022;12(3):36-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2022-12-3-36-50
Views:
146
Email this article 