Preview

Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law

Advanced search

Intentional bankruptcy in arbitration and criminal proceedings: Harmonization of approaches to qualification

https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2025-15-3-70-81

Abstract

Relevance. Arbitration managers, as part of their participation in the recognition of various types of debtors as bankrupt, identify signs of the intentional nature of bankruptcy in several thousand procedures annually. Law enforcement agencies also identify crimes related to illegal actions in bankruptcy, fictitious and intentional bankruptcy – several hundred cases per year.

Purpose. Is to find a legal mechanism that allows the conclusions on the intentional nature of bankruptcy made within the framework of the arbitration process to be translated into the criminal process.

Objectives of the study: to investigate the relevant law enforcement practice, comparing the conclusions drawn, based on sentences and decisions rendered under the same circumstances by arbitration and criminal courts; to identify and conduct a comparative analysis of approaches to qualifying the nature of bankruptcy as intentional, respectively, in arbitration and criminal proceedings; to propose measures to harmonize and synchronize such approaches as well as measures to ensure the end-to-end application of the same decision (conclusion) in arbitration and criminal proceedings.

Methodology. The research was based on such methods as formal legal and comparative legal. Also, methods of analysis, description, generalization, system-structural, statistical and mathematical were used.

Results. This article analyzes statistical data on the qualification of bankruptcy as intentional: on the one hand, by arbitration managers, on the other hand, by investigative and judicial authorities. The authors have revealed the reasons why there is a significant difference in the number of procedures qualified as intentional from the point of view of each of these parties. Based on the analysis of the methodological base used in arbitration and criminal proceedings, common approaches to the qualification of the same illegal act in such processes have been identified.

Conclusion. Based on the results of scientific analysis, proposals are given for unification of the applied approaches and synchronization of the existing methodological base. Proposals are formulated for amendments to regulatory legal acts that establish industry procedural rules and determine the signs of the deliberate nature of the actions of certain persons.

About the Authors

V. N. Tkachev
Southwest State University
Russian Federation

Valentin N. Tkachev, Doctor of Sciences (Juridical), Professor, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation, leading researcher at the Scientific and Educational center "Civilist" of the Department of Civil Law

50 Let Oktyabrya Str. 94, Kursk 305040



E. Hevlich
Megapolis Institute of Economics
Russian Federation

Hevlich Ekaterina, Researcher

3/1 Rubtsovskaya embankment Str., Moscow 105082



References

1. Tkachev V.N., Gevlich E. Methodology for the analysis of law enforcement practice in challenging transactions and bringing third parties to subsidiary liability in case of insolvency (bankruptcy). Vestnik ekonomicheskoj bezopasnosti = Bulletin of Economic Security. 2024;(3):158-165. (In Russ.)

2. Mikoni A.G. Problems of criminal law qualification of criminal bankruptcies. Yuridicheskaya nauka: istoriya i sovremennost' = Legal science: history and modernity. 2023;(5):115-119. (In Russ.)

3. Staroselets O.S. Features of criminal prosecution for intentional bankruptcy and for a combination of crimes with related compounds. Yuridicheskie issledovaniya = Legal research. 2024;(11):55-66. (In Russ.)

4. Yakubova D.E. Criminalistic characteristics of deliberate bankruptcy. NovaUm.Ru. 2021;(34):254-256. (In Russ.)

5. Bosholov S.S., Ivanova A.B. The main directions of countering deliberate and fictitious bankruptcy. Vserossijskij kriminologicheskij zhurnal = All-Russian Journal of Criminology. 2022;16(1):7-17. (In Russ.)

6. Zakhilko K.S. Norms on criminal bankruptcy in the Criminal Code of the Republic of Belarus in the context of the development of the Institute of bankruptcy. Zhurnal Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo = Journal of the Belarusian State University. Right. 2019;(2):17-24. (In Russ.)

7. Goncharova K.S., Maklakova V.V. Criminal bankruptcy: concept and forms. Ekonomika i biznes: teoriya i praktika = Economics and Business: theory and practice. 2024;(7):65-70. (In Russ.)

8. Pozdyshev R.S. Questions of the correlation of criminal bankruptcies. Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj akademii MVD Rossii = Legal science and practice: Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2024;(2):97-101. (In Russ.)

9. Barabash A.S. Development of the legal institute for the prevention of criminal bankruptcies. Voprosy rossijskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava = Issues of Russian and international law. 2024;(2- 1):229-237. (In Russ.)

10. Varfolomeev B.V. Problems of verification by the arbitration administrator of the presence of signs of fictitious and intentional bankruptcy in relation to individuals. Vlast' Zakona = The Power of Law. 2023;(4):197-207. (In Russ.)

11. Ponomareva N.S. Problems of legal regulation and identification of signs of deliberate bankruptcy. Pravovoj al'manah = The legal almanac. 2021;(4):21-29. (In Russ.)

12. Milova P.Y. Deliberate bankruptcy of individuals: an analysis of judicial practice. Pravovaya poziciya = Legal position. 2024;(4):67-71. (In Russ.)

13. Apukhtin Yu.V. Bankruptcy compliance as a legal instrument in bankruptcy cases. Arbitrazhnye spory = Arbitration disputes. 2024;(2):8. (In Russ.)

14. Gorodilov M.A., Belyaev A.S. Identification of signs of deliberate bankruptcy: an economic and analytical aspect. Perm: Perm. gos. nats. issled. un-t; 2021. 144 p. (In Russ.)

15. Tkachev V.N. The terms “bankruptcy” and “insolvency”: essence and correlation. Advokat = Advocate; 2003;(3):24-27. (In Russ.)

16. Tkachev V.N. On the issue of liability for criminal bankruptcies under the legislation of the Russian Federation. Yuridicheskij spravochnik rukovoditelya = Legal guide of the head. 2002;(11):8. (In Russ.)

17. Tkachev V.N. Signs and consequences of imaginary and fictitious bankruptcy. In: Rossijskoe gosudarstvo i uglublenie reform v kontekste vneshnih i vnutrennih ugroz bezopasnosti Rossii: materialy Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii = The Russian state and deepening reforms in the context of external and internal threats to Russia's security. Proceedings of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference. Moscow: Moskov. In-t MVD Rossii, SSU, 2002. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Tkachev V.N., Hevlich E. Intentional bankruptcy in arbitration and criminal proceedings: Harmonization of approaches to qualification. Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law. 2025;15(3):70-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2025-15-3-70-81

Views: 34


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2223-1501 (Print)