The Contribution of the Special Committee Under the Ministry of Finance to the Preparation of the Wine Reform of 1863
https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2022-12-1-184-193
Abstract
The relevance. The article reveals the personal composition of the Special Committee under the Ministry of Finance, established to design the wine reform, its role in determining the new course in relation to drinking. This historical plot is poorly covered in scientific publications, therefore it has an absolute novelty. The current stage of modernization of the alcohol market requires the search for successful practices of alcohol reformation in the history of Russia, which gives the study special relevance and significance.
The purpose is to highlight the composition of the Special Committee under the Ministry of Finance and its contribution to the development of the wine reform of 1863.
Objectives: to characterize the members of the Special Committee; to evaluate the final document; to explain why the case of wine reform was transferred from the Ministry of Finance to the Department of State Economy of the State Council.
Methodology. The solution of research tasks was carried out on the principles of historicism, scientific objectivity and consistency. Such methods as anthropological, comparative, and synchronous have also found their application in the work.
Results. On August 8, 1858, Alexander II established a Special Committee under the Ministry of Finance to develop an alternative drinking system to pay-offs. The Special Committee, headed by Finance Minister A.M. Knyazhevich, included Director of the Department of Various Taxes and Fees F.L. Pereverzev, Vice-Director and Ya.I. Golubev, as well as members of the Council of Finance Minister B.E. Prutchenko and A.I. Novitsky. All high officials had experience working with payoffs, knew their advantages and disadvantages. After spending a lot of time on discussion, they could not offer a worthy replacement for the pay-off order. The result of the work of the Special Committee under the Ministry of Finance was a note with a proposal for a certain "transitional system", which, according to the operating conditions, differed little from the payoffs.
Conclusions. All the previous official activities of the members of the Special Committee ingrained in them a fear of change. The committee of A.M. Knyazhevich did not propose anything other than a "transitional system". The "fashionable" excise system was rejected by the "reformers", which was justified by concern for the financial wellbeing of Russia. The case of wine reform was transferred to the Department of State Economy of the State Council under the patronage of A.P. Zablotsky-Desyatovsky.
About the Author
Natalia E. GoryushkinaRussian Federation
Doctor of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of History and Social and Cultural Service
50 let Oktyabrya str. 94, Kursk 305040
References
1. Vojnovich I. A. Pitejnyj vopros: issledovanie v ekonomicheskom i finansovom otnoshenii [Drinking question: research in economic and financial terms]. St. Petersburg, Tip. M. Ettingera, 1876. 164 p.
2. Golovachev A. A. Desyat' let reform [Ten years of reforms]. 1861–1871. St. Petersburg, V tip. F. S. Sushchinskogo, 1872. 398 p.
3. Lebedev V. A. Pitejnoe delo [Drinking business]. St. Petersburg, Tip. Pravitel'stvuyushchego senata, 1898. 106 p.
4. Terskij N. S. Pitejnye sbory i akciznaya sistema v Rossii: Ist. ocherk i nastoyashchee polozhenie: Opyt sravnitel'nogo issledovaniya glavnejshih rezul'tatov akciznoj sistemy i ee znacheniya dlya gosudarstva, kazny i naseleniya [Drinking fees and the excise system in Russia: Historical essay and the present situation: The experience of comparative research of the main results of the excise system and its significance for the state, treasury and population]. St. Petersburg, Tip. V. F. Kirshbauma, 1890. 252 p.
5. RGIA (Rossijskij gosudarstvennyj istoricheskij arhiv) [Russian State Historical Archive], f. 574, op. 1, d. 5, l. 1–4 ob.
6. Sudejkin V. T. Aleksandr Maksimovich Knyazhevich [Alexander Maksimovich Knyazhevich]. Russkaya starina = Russian Antiquity. G. 23, 1892, vol. 76, no. 10–12, pp. 398–432.
7. Skal'kovskij K. A. Nashi gosudarstvennye i obshchestvennye deyateli [Our statesmen and public figures]. St. Petersburg, Tip. A. S. Suvorina, 1891. 586 p.
8. GARF (Gosudarstvennyj arhiv Rossijskoj Federacii) [State Archive of the Russian Federation], f. 1155, op. 1, d. 221, l. 1-2.
9. Iz vospominanij Evgeniya Ivanovicha Lamanskogo (1840 – 1890 gg.) [From the memoirs of Evgeny Ivanovich Lamansky (1840–1890)]. Russkaya starina = Russian History, 1915, vol. 161, no. 1-3, pp. 367–375.
10. RGIA, f. 571, op. 1, d. 1119, l. 22.
11. Zapiski o Saratove K. I. Popova [Notes on Saratov by K. I. Popov]. Saratovskij kraj. Istoricheskie ocherki, vospominaniya, materialy [Saratov region. Historical essays, memoirs, materials]. Vyp. 1. Saratov, 1893, pp. 155–236.
12. Dnevnik Aleksandra Vasil'evicha Nikitenko [Diary of Alexander Vasilyevich Nikitenko]. Russkaya starina = Russian Antiquity. G. 21, 1890, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 35–53.
13. Gercen A. I. Fedor Pereverzev – vitiya rabstva [Fyodor Pereverzev - the vitia of slavery]. Kolokol = The Bell, 1859, September 15, l. 52.
14. GARF, f. 109, op. 3, d. 1750, l. 1 ob.
15. Svedeniya o pitejnyh sborah v Rossii [Information about drinking fees in Russia]. St. Petersburg, V Tip. II-go Otdeleniya sobstvennoj E. I. V. kancelyarii, 1860–1861, pt. 1. 201 p.
16. Spisok vysshim chinam gosudarstvennogo, gubernskogo i eparhial'nogo upravleniya [List of the highest ranks of the state, provincial and diocesan administration]. St. Petersburg, Tip. 2-go Otdeleniya Sobstvennoj E. I. V. kancelyarii, 1840, vol. 4, 124 p.
17. Vysshie chiny Rossijskoj imperii (22.10.1721 – 2.03.1917): biograficheskij slovar' [The highest ranks of the Russian Empire (22.10.1721 - 2.03.1917): biographical dictionary]; ed. by E. L. Potemkin. Moscow, 2019, vol. 3. 658 p.
18. Novickij A. I. Istoricheskoe obozrenie zakonodatel'stva o gerbovom sbore v Rossii [Historical review of the legislation on stamp duty in Russia]. St. Petersburg, Tip. Artillerijskogo Departamenta V. M. Publ., 1861. 119 p.
19. Novickij A. I. Istoricheskoe obozrenie zakonodatel'stva o krepostnoj poshline v Rossii [Historical review of Serf Duty legislation in Russia]. St. Petersburg, Tip. Artillerijskogo Departamenta V. M., 1862. 66 p.
20. Goryushkina N. E. "Ya broshu otkupa, no ukazhite mne, chem ih zametit'": o vozvrate otkupov v ministerstvo E.F. Kankrina ["I will throw the pay-offs, but tell me how to notice them": about the return of pay-offs to the Ministry of E.F. Kankrin]. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Proceedings of the Southwest State University, 2013, no. 6 (51), pt. 1, pp. 202–206.
21. RGIA, f. 574, op. 1, d. 1, l. 4.
22. Svedeniya o pitejnyh sborah v Rossii [Information about drinking fees in Russia]. St. Petersburg, V Tip. II-go Otdeleniya sobstvennoj E. I. V. kancelyarii, 1860–1861, pt. 5. 251 p.
23. GARF, f. 647, op. 1, d. 218, l. 2-8 ob.
24. GARF, f. 647, op. 1, d. 203, l. 1-5.
Review
For citations:
Goryushkina N.E. The Contribution of the Special Committee Under the Ministry of Finance to the Preparation of the Wine Reform of 1863. Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law. 2022;12(1):184-193. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2022-12-1-184-193