Preview

Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law

Advanced search

Return of the criminal case to the prosecutor for drawing up a indictment or a bill of indictment in a criminal case sent to court with a ruling on the application of a compulsory medical measure

https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2025-15-6-112-123

Abstract

Relevance. One of the problems associated with determining the procedural status of a person with a mental disorder who has committed a crime is the difficulty of establishing and diagnosing the mental disorder, the level of its severity, and, as a result, the recognition of the person as an accused and their criminal liability, or the decision to apply compulsory medical measures to them.
The purpose of the study is to determine the grounds for considering the issue of returning the criminal case to the prosecutor at a preliminary hearing; to resolve the issue of applying a preventive measure and determining the procedural status of the person whose criminal case is being sent to the prosecutor.
Objectives: to establish the grounds for considering the issue of returning the criminal case to the prosecutor for drawing up a charge sheet instead of a ruling on the application of compulsory medical measures at the preliminary hearing; to establish the procedure for making a decision on the application of a preventive measure against the specified person; and to determine the composition of the persons participating in the preliminary hearing when considering these issues.
The research methodology includes the dialectical method, the comparative legal method, the formal logical method, and the methods of analysis and synthesis.
Results. During the study, the composition of the persons participating in the preliminary hearing on the return of the criminal case to the prosecutor for the preparation of an indictment was determined. The grounds for considering this issue were proposed, and the materials to be examined at the preliminary hearing were identified.
Conclusion. When the preliminary hearing considers the issue of returning the criminal case to the prosecutor for the purpose of drawing up a charge sheet instead of a ruling on the use of compulsory medical measures, the following participants must be present: the person in question, their legal representative, a defense attorney, the prosecutor, the chairman of the expert commission that conducted the forensic psychiatric examination, and the psychiatrist who observed the person after their admission to a psychiatric clinic based on the forensic psychiatric examination.

About the Authors

T. K. Ryabinina
Southwest State University
Russian Federation

Tatyana K. Ryabinina, Doctor of Sciences (Juridical), Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics

Kursk



L. G. Tatyanina
Udmurt State University
Russian Federation

Larisa G. Tatyanina, Doctor of Sciences (Juridical), Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics

Izhevsk



References

1. Zaitseva E.A., Trifonova K.A. The legal institute of returning a criminal case for additional investigation: Problems of theory and practice. Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2014. 224 p. (In Russ.)

2. Petrukhin I.L. Re-investigation: Divergences between law and practice. Ugolovnyi protsess = Criminal Procedure. 2007;(8):27-30. (In Russ.)

3. Kashepov V.P. On the transformation of the status of the court in criminal proceedings. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law. 2002;(12):3-7. (In Russ.)

4. Morozov P. Transformation of the institution of returning a criminal case to the prosecutor by the court. Zakonnost' = Legality. 2005;(8):36-38. (In Russ.)

5. Trisheva A. Return of a criminal case to the prosecutor: The fate of the institution. Zakonnost' = Legality. 2015;(4):50-55. (In Russ.)

6. Zykin V. It is necessary to restore the institution of returning criminal cases to the prosecutor by the court for additional investigation. Zakonnost' = Legality. 2005;(8):33-35. (In Russ.)

7. Ryabinina T.K. On the grounds for appointing a preliminary hearing. In: Vlasova S.V. (ed.) Problemy primeneniya ugolovno-protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva: puti ikh resheniya: materialy Mezhdunarodnoi onlain-konferentsii 31 maya 2018 g. = Problems of applying criminal procedure legislation: ways to solve them Proceedings of the International online conference on May 31, 2018. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhegorod. akad. MVD Rossii; 2019. P. 514-521. (In Russ.)

8. Speech by the State Prosecutor A.A. Derbenev on December 27, 2002. Nezavisimyi psikhiatricheskii zhurnal = Independent Psychiatric Journal. 2003;(1). (In Russ.) Available from: http://test.npar.ru/journal/2003/1/report.htm (accessed 20.09.2025).

9. Kitaev N.N. Unjust sentences to death. St. Petersburg: Yuridicheskiy Tsentr Press; 2004. 388 p. (In Russ.)

10. Petrukhin I.L. (ed.) Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Moscow: TK Velbi; 2002 896 p. (In Russ.)

11. Spasennikov B.A., Spasennikova M.G. On the signs of simulation of mental disorders by the under-investigation. Vestnik Meditsinskogo instituta «REAVIZ» = Bulletin of the Medical Institute "REAVIZ". 2017;(2):47-50. (In Russ.)

12. Safuanov F.S. Simulation of mental disorder: socio-psychological aspect. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal = Russian Psychiatric Journal. 2018;(4):48-55. (In Russ.)

13. Tatyanina L.G. The beginning of proceedings on the application of compulsory medical measures in criminal proceedings. Sudebnaya vlast' i ugolovnyi protsess = Judicial Power and Criminal Procedure. 2022;(1):25-31. (In Russ.)

14. Kurbatova S.M. Persons with disabilities as participants in criminal proceedings. Rossiiskii sud'ya = Russian Judge. 2023;(4):37-42. (In Russ.)

15. Tatyanin D.V. The principle of ensuring the right to defense for the accused and suspect. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i pravo = Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Series: Economics and Law. 2020;5(30):763-768. (In Russ.)

16. Ryabinina T.K. Some problems of legal regulation of the application of forced medical measures. Zakonnost' = Legality. 2008;(8):48-51. (In Russ.)

17. Ryabinina T.K. Preliminary hearing as a means of maintaining the reasonableness of the criminal procedure period. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law. 2013;(2):52-63. (In Russ.)

18. Saliev M.M., Agranovsky M.L., Muminov R.K., Azimova G.A. Remission in endogenous diseases: epidemiology, psychopathology, clinical and social forecast. Ekonomika i sotsium = Economics and Society. 2023;(3-2):653-657. (In Russ.)

19. Bardenstein L.M., Aleshkina G.A., Murtazalieva L.A. Affective disorders in the structure of acute transient psychotic disorders: clinical, dynamic, and prognostic aspects. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal = Russian Psychiatric Journal. 2013;(5):27-32. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Ryabinina T.K., Tatyanina L.G. Return of the criminal case to the prosecutor for drawing up a indictment or a bill of indictment in a criminal case sent to court with a ruling on the application of a compulsory medical measure. Proceedings of Southwest State University. Series: History and Law. 2025;15(6):112-123. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2025-15-6-112-123

Views: 101

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2223-1501 (Print)